Search results

i'm assuming you dont just pick a random arbiter. Whilst they are not allowed to have any connections to the club/UEFA I'm sure we would have 'interviewed' them to get a perspective on how they would view things. They know who picked them & that must weigh on their mind when weighing up the...

Our pick is a lawyer, UEFAs is a law professor. That might explain the difference in thinking and rationale? I’m neither, so don’t take my word for it!

Page 45 Para 128 Is should be presumed the the sponsorships were negotiated at arms length with unrelated parties at fair value. Not exactly a ruling, but as UEFA never pressed the issue, it was wrong for them to proceed on the opposite assumption.

It seems impossible that you can go from penning something like this, which is balanced and makes no sensationalist claims, to being such a vitriolic snake.

This is a really good piece of proper journalism in respect of the 2014 settlement agreement. https://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/english-soccer/revealed-manchester-city-s-ffp-breaches-before-2014-uefa-deal-1.4149047

whilst being a related party would have meant we couldn’t be accused of disguising owner investment, it would have left us open to a UEFA assessment of fair value. also, give that CAS has ruled that Etihad, Aabar & Etisalat are NOT related parties, does that not point to the 2014 settlement...

Surely City know that DS have probably every email ever sent, so must be aware that this could happen. nowhere for UEFA to go with it, but just feeds the haters and the fuckwits parading as journalists.

Chairman was chosen from a CAS list by the way.

I love the way these spineless pricks are using the phrase ‘insufficient evidence’ as if it’s a technicality. I accuse you of murdering 15 people. I don’t have any evidence, it that doesn’t mean you didn’t do it. you can’t win against this sort of biased anti logic. just smile and wallow in...

The haters landscape has shifted somewhat, don’t you think? ‘City are a state owned club’. Debunked. ‘City overstated their sponsorships’. Debunked ‘The sponsors are all Mansour owned’. Debunked ‘The owner disguised investment as sponsorship’. Debunked All charges categorically shown to be...

Just smile and laugh at his salty tears.

Is Jo cup tied?

To be fair, it does state we obstructed the investigation, in the section outlining why a €10m was arrived at.

When it’s Arab oil money.

Translated from der Spiegel They also made a half-hearted attempt to get the original documents: Uefa's legal department asked SPIEGEL to publish the material on Manchester City. However, SPIEGEL does not generally pass on confidential documents from informants and informs Uefa that it must...

I’ve said before that UEFA is a multi layered organisation, with many different factions, all with different and sometimes opposing agendas. To treat it as a single, united entity with a common goal is a mistake. as has been said by others on here, it wouldn’t be surprising if certain elements...

wrong bloke. The twat in the video is Dave Kitson.

The annoying thing is that Kitson isn’t an idiot. He’s an intelligent person with varied business interests. Doesn’t have anything specific against us from his past, he is just typical of the masses who believe the shit spouted by the media over the past 6-7years. Brainwashed and unable to back...

Warnock on 5 live saying its our legal team who have protracted the process to make it time barred. We must have done something wrong for UEFA to have charged us. Shouldn’t let pigshit thick pundits do anything other than co-commentate. Bottomless pit of money thrown at lawyers. What a c*nt

Very telling that Pep knows that the case against us is instigated by the ‘elite’ clubs ‘you lost off the pitch, so know you must try to beat us on the pitch’ He knows and they are shitting themselves.