Search results

I’m not sure that is one though is it, given there’s no conflicting policies in place. It’s just that we’re shit at looking after people that have been made homeless.

He knows your opinion on this topic! ;)

Useful but depressing!

I think we’re using different definitions of the term, I’d personally consider some as embodying that. I understand your perspective though.

You don’t think we have had leaders and monarchs in our history that have displayed similar behaviours?

Which is fine, when I replied to your first comment, it was the sentiment of might is right, not the arguments specifically of that book.

I agree with might is right, just not that it’s anything to do with post Christian Britain, it’s always been the case, it just changes as to who has it.

I wouldn’t disagree with your first paragraph there.

I think this is indicative of the challenges around the political debate right now. Everything is being pushed to be so binary with it phrased as a them and us, when in reality outside of social media echo chambers (which is still where most people I know at least reside), opinions aren’t so...

I’d like that and your point on the crossover is exactly why I wouldn’t want to see 3pm PL games televised. I go to Notts County and there’s quite a few Forest fans that do too when they can. They wouldn’t get those anywhere near as often.

I agree about the multiple platforms, just not playing the 3pm kick offs.

This is a moronic statement.

That’s not how court orders work! Even so, you were sugggesting she put a gagging order in around this, that’s clearly not the case. An NHS compensation claim like her sons, they will usually ask for non disclosure, it’s just standard.

Because they’re inextricably linked. She can’t discuss the tax on the hove house without discussing the Ashton house as the whole thing is about the ownership and the trust. I’m not asking you to believe anything, I’m just pointing out the facts. The court order isn’t new, it’s been in place...

The NHS usually. What do you think the court order was for?

To be fair, you did say she took out a gagging order.

Good summary and the relevant case law of it all here - https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/09/05/angela-rayner-hmrc-penalties/

That doesn’t make sense to be fair, think you’re confusing the initial gift to the trust with the subsequent sale of the rest of her stake.

What’s happened to the telegraph is one of the most depressing things about our current media tbh.

Eh? No she didn’t take a gag order out nor did she know she was liable. She should have done though.