Search results

  1. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review DECISION DAY TODAY!!!!! (p 71) Depends what you mean by commercially motivated - FC are not separate from the money economy, they pay for things and are paid for things, but they are constituted as a 'not for profit' organisation. That is different from 'non...
  2. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review DECISION DAY TODAY!!!!! (p 71) Great to see everyone getting ready to wallow in conspiracy theory cushioned defeat. Also amazed that postings on an internet message board can be taken as so uncritically factual by posters on another message board. MES - I share...
  3. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) Hmm, ok bad choice of phrasing - there are genuine concerns, it will affect them, but I for one am not convinced that the concerns expressed by that residents' group take in the scope of concerns that the council has to take on board. For all the...
  4. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) I of course accept that Moston people have a right to oppose and protest against this proposed development, and if the club thought that organised opposition by the residents' group was truly representative of the people of Moston, then I'm sure...
  5. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) RE: the Rochdale 'sell out'... Again, this is another sad example of those without principles using a deliberately misrepresented caricature of others' principles against them. The club is not against having the odd game on telly, as long as the...
  6. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) Sorry MES, you're right to question this - I mistakenly thought you had made the comment about working class jobs, when it was tuertsoverheadkick. Apologies for my lack of attention.
  7. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) Yes, some 'working class' fans of United don't like FC, but that doesn't mean FC don't represent and stand up for their interests. It's about class consciousness - see the history of any workers' movement for more of the same. ancoats - in answer...
  8. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) You scoffed at the idea that FC might represent the interests of the working class fan because some people involved with the club don't have what you regard as working class jobs.
  9. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) Mad Eyed Screamer, it's quite sad to see someone who for a long time stood up for the match-going fan using such weak arguments to try to undermine an independent supporter movement. Your 'middle class' vs 'working class' argument merely plays on a...
  10. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) Come on, I think we all know the real reason City fans can't stand FCUM. For a while in 2005 many City fans lapped FC up, thinking it was a great way to get at United, but then two things stopped this in its tracks. First, it became apparent that...
  11. L

    FC United - Oral Hearing - judge rejects appeal (p 82)

    Re: FC United - Judicial Review day 2 (pg 61) well said.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.