I just don't agree that he's doing "alright". I think that's generous.
I think he's lost some confidence and, at the moment, isn't quite responding to the increased scrutiny that comes with being a £100m player for the Premier League champions. Go back through the MOTM threads from the first couple of months of the season and you'll see that he started like a house on fire (or at least we thought he did). He was voted MOTM two or three times in a small group of games, so clearly we all felt impressed by him!
Ever since then I think he's been reigned in a bit by Pep. In my view, the things he's been getting wrong ever since that away game at Liverpool are down to him having to re-learn how he plays football. It's something all City players talk about - they spend their entire careers playing football one way, then suddenly have a huge culture shock when they realise Pep sees football completely differently.
He's gone from being the main man at Villa to being part of an oiled system at City. When he first came and all eyes were on him, he probably still felt a bit like the main man. But then the season rolled on, he became just another City player who got cheered on and shouted at just as much as everyone else, and things changed a bit. He's used to being a central creative type with leadership qualities - at the moment he's out on the left and more of a cog.
I'd be more worried about his contributions but we've seen this before, especially with midfielders and attackers we've signed under Pep. They come in with big reputations but don't quite work at first. It took a season for Pep and Leroy to work each other out, it took 12 months for Pep to realise Bernardo was best down the middle. Mahrez, Rodri, Cancelo - they all took about a season to adjust, then something clicked.
Heck, it took three years for some City fans to stop demanding Gundogan's sale. The one attacker we've signed under Pep that started brilliantly was Nolito, and boy did he burn out fast!
I think some people who are being critical of Grealish are going a bit overboard. Anyone who defends him or asks for a bit of patience really does get shouted down. It happened to me about an hour ago. Criticism of him isn't a problem because when a player costs £100m it's natural to expect more than what he's given us so far, and we're only on a forum, but we're all watching him so closely to see if he'll get it right or fuck it up and I'm not sure it's helping any of us.
It gets like that with Sterling sometimes, where every single occasion he gets the ball you're hoping he does something decisive or game-changing because he'll get absolute dog's abuse if he doesn't, and more often than not he doesn't. It got like that with Mahrez for a bit and there were games I wrote off during the 19-20 season simply because Rodri started them. It's something all of them play their way out of in the end.
If we're still having these conversations in December 2022 then we'll need to analyse whether he's worth keeping around. But 4 months into his City career is too early to draw any conclusions, negative or positive. So far he's been a bit indecisive and predictable on the left - but he's not exactly costing us games and, at the very least, you can trust him to find a blue shirt, even if that blue shirt is always the easy pass inside to Gundogan or back to Cancelo.
Some say they want more for £100m and that's fine. To be honest, so do I. But we've not paid £100m because we think he's the best player in the world, we've paid £100m because we wanted him for our system and that was just what Villa asked for. It's not really about him being worth £100m, it's about him being worth the time we spent scouting him and negotiating for him. He's not showing that just yet, but I wish we'd be a bit more relaxed while we wait for him to do so.