GX Blue
Well-Known Member
FFS Talk about looking for negatives.
I like Doku.
This a Doku discussion. Good or bad. Funny or whatever.
It was just an observation.
FFS Talk about looking for negatives.
agreed if we're talking about performance and commenting that he has still got a lot to learn from Pep and is only young etc but to comment on the fact he looked unhappy when we scored is - well - just unnecessaryI like Doku.
This a Doku discussion. Good or bad. Funny or whatever.
It was just an observation.
agreed if we're talking about performance and commenting that he has still got a lot to learn from Pep and is only young etc but to comment on the fact he looked unhappy when we scored is - well - just unnecessary
A thesis is around 75,000 words long, his reply was about 1% of a thesis.This thesis is just too long.
It's football not some diplomatic treaty.
You are right, but my point was that the vitriol directed at Doku based on his performance relative to others is just way too extreme. Until the 60th minute nothing came off for anyone. And while Jeremy bears responsibility for his part, mostly for being too static and predictable, some of the things being said are just plain wrong and unfair.I have previously called him a special talent, a star in the making, etc., so I hope my comment is seen as in good faith. I still think he can live up to it, but it largely depends on whether he has that fire in him to develop his game. Anyway, the link doesn't work for me, but I presume it's his highlights/one of those every-touch videos (although these are often not accurate/lack context). Instead, I will refer to my observations/some stats and try to justify why he is criticised right now/for a while now.
To begin with, not doing anything wrong is not enough to justify a starting place in this City side. Not in the position he is playing in. Whereas Nathan Ake fits the description of someone who usually doesn't do anything wrong (his main job as a defender) and is rightly praised for it, Jeremy occasionally gets dispossessed in positions that often lead to counter-attacks and cost us goals in the past. Even if he doesn't do anything wrong in a particular game, then it's still not enough. For example, Sergio Gomez hasn't done anything wrong this season per se, yet he doesn't get a sniff and hasn't played in a long time. He is great technically, provides dangerous crosses, and doesn't get dispossessed much. In a way, he is more of a City-type player than Jeremy, but he probably lacks this one thing he excels at. Of course, I am not claiming Gomez is better than Jeremy. Jeremy has some very special talents, which is exactly why Pep keeps on giving him chances. What I am trying to say is that what makes or made (earlier in the season) Jeremy special is what he can provide in terms of a direct, attacking threat. Therefore, can he use his acceleration and dribble past his opponents as the biggest dribbler in Europe, and thus create chances for himself or others? If he can't, then he suddenly has very little use to this City team since he is a little one-dimensional as it stands.
Now, let's compare him to the other players. For example, you mentioned Bernardo, KDB, and Haaland. Firstly, Haaland is the exception in this City team and is the only player allowed to contribute not much other than holding up the ball and creating space for others with his big, physical presence. However, he is judged by his goals. That's his special skill. If his goals were to stop, he would be criticised, and it happened before (1st half of the game yesterday, even). Nevertheless, because he scores ridiculous amounts of goals, he justifies his place in the City team even if it seems like he is not doing much else. That brings me to KDB. Again, Kevin is special for his creativity. Consequently, he is mostly judged based on chances created for others and assists. He does that incredibly well, even if he doesn't assist in a particular match. For example, he had 6 key passes yesterday, 12 crosses, 4/4 successful long balls, and 1/1 successful through ball. Therefore, whereas he might have been below his usual best in the world at what he does standard, he still did his job well and created a lot of potential chances. Finally, Bernardo. For starters, his work rate is insanely high, so he contributes much more defensively than Jeremy. For example, 4 interceptions to Jeremy's 0, although Bernardo does so much more than that. On the other hand, he still had 7 key passes and 8 crosses to Jeremy's 1 key pass and 2 crosses. Bernardo had more successful long/through balls as well. Therefore, Bernardo did his job incredibly well as well. Created chances and read the game well defensively. Of course, I understand Jeremy got subbed, but both Kevin and Bernardo had better stats before Jeremy was subbed, and both proved for years that they are game-changers.
To summarise, everyone in the City team has a job and is judged based on it. Players like Haaland, Bernardo, or KDB are recognised, established world-class players, who are always capable of some magic. They have worked for that status by displaying consistently high standards for years (even in the case of Haaland). For Jeremy, he has to prove himself, so not doing anything wrong is not enough for him because recently he doesn't do what he is good at. We didn't bring him to City for his ball-retention skills. He has been playing ahead of a treble-winning Jack Grealish, who had a magnificent season last season, and Oscar Bobb, who has been previously called a Future Ballon d'Or winner by City officials. Yesterday, he also played ahead of Julian Alvarez, a World Cup winner, who scores and creates for fun since day 1 at City, or Kovacic, if you twist the tactic, so a guy who has won several CL titles, and proved himself internationally, so is generally incredible at what he does for years. The bar is set incredibly high. If you are not world-class, it's not enough to start.
That's what I make of it anyway.