14 | Nico Gonzalez - 2025/26

a blind man can see there is a disconnect between Guardiola and the DoF. This isn’t even just Hugo Viana it’s mainly been Txiki.

How can the club keep buying players that Guardiola doesn’t want, surely they must run the signings past him.

Phillips, Nico G, Khusanov, Reis, Nunes that’s £200m roughly on players Guardiola won’t pick. To be fair he is picking Nunes but at right back after coming out and saying he isn’t clever enough to play the position he has played his whole career. Now is that Guardiola’s fault or is it the DoF buying players the manager thinks aren’t worth bothering with.
I don't agree with that. Do you think the board just buy players behind Peps back? Surely not.

I'm sure they sit down with Pep and discuss it together. Nico G was a player Pep knew from the Barcelona academy. Nunes is a player he publicly stated was one of the best midfielders in Europe. Kalvin Phillips was another player he publicly praised in the media. Reis and Khusanov are Viana targets possibly, but they aren't signed without Pep's approval.
 
Absolutely baffling what Pep is playing at, two fresh players there who for me should've been nailed on starters, but both ended up barely breaking a sweat as they did last season
you only become a nailed on starter when you’ve played well consistently , these two are miles away from that , now we have bought more players and the injuries have cleared up they’ve got a tough job actually getting minutes to prove it , Khusanov has loads of time to develop and learn the game and our system , maybe a loan could be the answer , Gonzalez just hasnt impressed me so far
 
Pep's 'favourites' have been letting us down quite a bit too often in the last year or so. If he hasn't seen that, he's blind.
Assuming that he isn't, his stubborn reluctance to change things, either tactically or players, when opportunities have arisen, is baffling.
Perhaps, like many City fans, he too has convinced himself that he is some sort of infallible god...
I wanted Pep to stay because I wanted the best manager there is to oversee the needed rebuild. I didn’t realise that sticking with the old guard and kicking the rebuild can down the road another year or two was an option. Its certainly not a well-thought out one. If Pep has signed a new deal to simply stick with what he knows, while the club spunks hundreds of millions on players he won’t play, it will turn out to be a error of epic proportions by the club.
 
Having watched how pep operates for 9 years or so it’s really obvious when he doesn’t rate or fancy a player.

I’ve been saying for a few weeks now I expect nico to leave. Pep just doesn’t want him for whatever reason and it’s pretty bloody obvious at this point. If you can’t see it your being very naive imo
 
Pep's 'favourites' have been letting us down quite a bit too often in the last year or so. If he hasn't seen that, he's blind.
Assuming that he isn't, his stubborn reluctance to change things, either tactically or players, when opportunities have arisen, is baffling.
Perhaps, like many City fans, he too has convinced himself that he is some sort of infallible god...

It's easy to criticise. It's easy to say he should play others. It's easy to say play a different way. It's easy to slag players off. And everything is definitely always easy in hindsight.

You (and I) don't know everything that's happened behind the scenes, but we all do know we've had a lot of injuries. Yes, there's a point where players have to change because of that, but again, it's easy to criticise without knowing the full situation.

Also, its not just down to us, but down to the opposition as well. They also have plans, they can also play well. They often have good players. Usually, their fans have a lot more to criticise than we do as well.

Pep has changed things many times in the last few years, there's no reluctance to change. Sometimes there is too much change! I don't think anyone thinks he's infallible, but he does get it right more often than not.

Now, as this is the Nico thread....

Do I think he should have been used more? Yes.
Do I think he's brilliant? No.
Can he improve? Yes
Is he as good as Gundogan, Bernardo, Kovacic, Rodri or Reijnders right now? Probably not.
Should we have bought him? Maybe not. Maybe he'll come good - or maybe we bought him in case Gundogan or Kovacic got injured. Maybe he was a short-term safety net. Who bloody knows?
 
The fake rumour about his agent looking for a move!? just a caution to you here is more fake rumours from the first 2 seasons of Rodri..

- Juventus Swap Deal Sensation: In December 2019, Italian tabloids supposedly claimed Juventus were plotting a bold move to lure Rodri away from Manchester City. The rumor suggested a swap deal involving Miralem Pjanić plus €30 million, with Juve reportedly believing Rodri was struggling to adapt to the Premier League’s pace. City allegedly laughed off the offer, with Pep Guardiola insisting Rodri was “untouchable.”

- PSG’s Mega-Money Bid: Around March 2020, a fabricated French outlet reported that Paris Saint-Germain were preparing a €100 million bid for Rodri to bolster their midfield alongside Marco Verratti. The rumor claimed PSG saw Rodri as unsettled in Manchester due to City’s inconsistent season, with whispers of a “secret meeting” in Paris. City supposedly rejected the approach outright, citing Rodri’s five-year contract.

- Barcelona Homecoming Whispers: In early 2020, fake Spanish gossip suggested Barcelona were keen to bring Rodri back to La Liga as a long-term successor to Sergio Busquets. The rumor alleged that Rodri, a former Atlético Madrid player, was “homesick” and tempted by a return to Spain. No deal materialized, as City’s project under Guardiola was said to have kept him committed.
 
People have been dismissing me for months when I said they fell out after Spurs away . Amazing a journo hasn't asked Pep this yet .

I'm interested by this point but I don't really remember it. Was it straight when he got subbed? If so, any links?
 
Did you forget the whole of last season?

They might 'understand' what he's been after but it's not getting us anywhere is it!!

Our season started well, then we had a ton of injuries and it went to shit. Then players started coming back and we improved.

There is every chance that IF Nico (or Reis, or Khusanov) had played more games, we'd have missed CL qualification.

Maybe.
 
When it so hard to win league titles trophies this take after one season is so easy to have this thinking! I had doubts but I look what we won look how at one point there was a lot of fans think we wouldn’t even get top five and I was one! Pep said he wanted his player fit and back once he had look at the run we had to get 3rd. Yes pep made wrong choices but don’t you think he deserves his last two years to put it right?
He definitely deserves the chance…..but I wish he would have more faith in some of the younger players….my biggest criticism of Pep.
 
I said that too. Nico challenged pep as he was coming off he asked him why me? They had couple words. And that was it for Nicos city career

Assume this is the incident…

Speaking after the win, Guardiola told the media: “It was an action that he should be more in a position and he jumped [forward] and he should not have done it. It was a tactical reason.

“Of course, in that age, if he complains to the manager then it’s a big problem, but it wasn’t the case…”
 
He definitely deserves the chance…..but I wish he would have more faith in some of the younger players….my biggest criticism of Pep.

If Pep plays the younger players and fails to compete, then his critics will say: how can he fail after so many signings...?

People will always find ways to whine if/when we don't win. We won 4 in a row just 12 months ago and many are complaining as if we haven't won anything for years.
 
Having watched how pep operates for 9 years or so it’s really obvious when he doesn’t rate or fancy a player.

I’ve been saying for a few weeks now I expect nico to leave. Pep just doesn’t want him for whatever reason and it’s pretty bloody obvious at this point. If you can’t see it your being very naive imo

100% agree

This is Kalvin Phillips all over again, and in the same way Pep sort of refuses to give him game time.

The fact he barely touched grass at the CWC, even when Rodri wasn't playing, was incredibly telling.

I don't buy all the rhetoric that because Rodri didn't settle in his first season, give Nico G time. Rodri played in 52 games in first season at City and wasn't half as bad as many seem to remember. He has a shaky opening few months, then hit a rocket at Burnley away in December and didn't look back.

Nico G as of now will be lucky to play in 20 matches next season, of which will likely be 15-20 minutes stints.

I think he gets moved on.
 
100% agree

This is Kalvin Phillips all over again, and in the same way Pep sort of refuses to give him game time.

The fact he barely touched grass at the CWC, even when Rodri wasn't playing, was incredibly telling.

I don't buy all the rhetoric that because Rodri didn't settle in his first season, give Nico G time. Rodri played in 52 games in first season at City and wasn't half as bad as many seem to remember. He has a shaky opening few months, then hit a rocket at Burnley away in December and didn't look back.

Nico G as of now will be lucky to play in 20 matches next season, of which will likely be 15-20 minutes stints.

I think he gets moved on.

The comparison with Phillips is off the mark. Gonzales played many more minutes in 4 months than Phillips did for a whole season or two.

Imo, it's not that Pep doesn't like his quality. He literally said after Newcastle he is a great player, one for many years... The problem, if there's one, is personal. Nico might be a bit big-headed...
 
100% agree

This is Kalvin Phillips all over again, and in the same way Pep sort of refuses to give him game time.

The fact he barely touched grass at the CWC, even when Rodri wasn't playing, was incredibly telling.

I don't buy all the rhetoric that because Rodri didn't settle in his first season, give Nico G time. Rodri played in 52 games in first season at City and wasn't half as bad as many seem to remember. He has a shaky opening few months, then hit a rocket at Burnley away in December and didn't look back.

Nico G as of now will be lucky to play in 20 matches next season, of which will likely be 15-20 minutes stints.

I think he gets moved on.
He played in 17 games minute wise 950 that’s was from Januarys when we bought him! That’s is not pep not liking him
 
The comparison with Phillips is off the mark. Gonzales played many more minutes in 4 months than Phillips did for a whole season or two.

Imo, it's not that Pep doesn't like his quality. He literally said after Newcastle he is a great player, one for many years... The problem, if there's one, is personal. Nico might be a bit big-headed...
I’m not so sure. There’s a lot of jumping to conclusions which is understandable considering his omission but it’s all based on assumptions. No one has heard anything concrete. Let’s see if 1. Hes still with us when the window closes 2. He gets any time outside of cup games.

I’m hoping it’s that Pep can see he needs to learn the role better and get up to PL speed and we see a gradual introduction next season.
 
Especially Not when it comes to team selection.

He won't tolerate criticism or negative views on his systems / tactics etc. That's why he surrounds himself with 'yes men'. That's why he's known to have offloaded a number of exceptional but opinionated players in the past.
He ditched Zinchenko because of something his missus said! As I understand it, one of the reasons he's ditching Jack Grealish is for questioning his instructions.

He's destined to end up like Malcolm Allison.
 
I don't agree with that. Do you think the board just buy players behind Peps back? Surely not.

I'm sure they sit down with Pep and discuss it together. Nico G was a player Pep knew from the Barcelona academy. Nunes is a player he publicly stated was one of the best midfielders in Europe. Kalvin Phillips was another player he publicly praised in the media. Reis and Khusanov are Viana targets possibly, but they aren't signed without Pep's approval.
I’m with you on this, and you must be right. surely the club wouldn’t buy players without atleast running them past Pep but… you have to admit it is weird how many seem to be signed and then barely play.

I know Kalvin Phillips is a specific example but allegedly after selling Lavia (this still annoys me) and seeing Phillips in a couple of training sessions Pep and the coaching staff instantly regretted the transfer and felt he wasn’t good enough.

Now I have no idea if similar has happened with other signings but the optics suggest similar might have happened with a few more of the recent signings. You just have to look at the minutes of players used in the club World Cup and you can see it suggests some players don’t seem to be wanted or they would have played.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top