Yes I agree, I think that's exactly what Guardiola is doing, he doesn't get the derby emotion but is maybe concentrating on the bigger picture, there's no doubt that we will need KDB in the big moments later in the seasonNeed to find a way to allow him to play his way back into form, but not to the detriment of the team. The false 9 option might be the best way to do it.
Not really a difficult piece of logic I would have thought.Doesn't matter what you're answer is, hindsight has now proven that it is the wrong one.
You're going just as overboard as some of those you're arguing against by acting like it's ridiculous to suggest players who have been in form should be starting over a player who has looked like he has dyspraxia since he came back from injury.
You can argue about exactly why he was picked over the others but the fact of the matter is that he was absolutely diabolical yesterday and played at the expense of someone who has been much better recently.
Whatever his reasoning, the outcome was a bad loss and Kevin our worst performer. He is an incredible player. I was watching some highlights from the last few seasons and he has been unbelievable for us. His passing, shooting, vision and workrate. That goal against Arsenal away last season, footballing poetry.If you think that the fairy godmother will come down from the heavens and create a big chance because of Silva's form, then I worry for you. Our forwards are shit at finishing and so we need creators. People have deluded themselves into thinking that the entire team can just run around a bit and Gundo will pull a Messi out of his arse twice every game and then we can all have a wank about how great total football is.
The same Guardiola that has played 5 different players at false 9 this season, the same Guardiola that's pushing Gundo in the box, the same Guardiola that has created a role for Cancelo that defies explanation is also willing to play an unfit Kevin over in-form players. Ask yourself why that is the case?
All I'm hearing are judgements and criticism, not a single comment even willing to poke at the question "why". The only conclusion I'm hearing on this forum is that he made a mistake. Show me the line of reasoning, at least try to think why Pep is doing what he is doing. After all he has done for this club, he deserves that much. Funny thing is that I don't even need to convince anyone, all you need to do is just ask - why would Pep start Kevin and not go with the in-form players? What could possibly force him to make that decision?
Kevin made 8 key passes yesterday. The next highest was Gundo with 3. That's his job in the team - chance creation. He did it. Could he have done better? Sure, but we're arguing whether a 7/10 performance is better than 10/10. Of course it is. The idea that somehow he was the worst performer on the pitch is quite something. I would imagine that a bloody striker conceding a penalty in the 2nd minute, a RB running around like a headless chicken for 90 min and a winger missing multiple tap ins from 4 yards out would be in contention for the worst performance, but what do I know. Replace Kev with Bernardo and Gundo and Stones each bag a hattrick. Football is simple.Whatever his reasoning, the outcome was a bad loss and Kevin our worst performer. He is an incredible player. I was watching some highlights from the last few seasons and he has been unbelievable for us. His passing, shooting, vision and workrate. That goal against Arsenal away last season, footballing poetry.
The Kev we have just now is a shadow of that player for whatever reason. I'm not being critical for critical sake, just posting what my eyes tell me. Its a problem and Pep may well be trying to solve it by playing him back to fitness. Yesterday it hurt us.
Fucking hell, this place is a caricature at times.
Kevin made 8 key passes yesterday. The next highest was Gundo with 3. That's his job in the team - chance creation. He did it. Could he have done better? Sure, but we're arguing over a 7/10 performance is better than 10/10. Of course it is. The idea that somehow he was the worst performer on the pitch is quite something.
There's a tendency to think that good performances over a 6 game stretch can be extrapolated to a 38 game season or 60 plus including cups with the exact same tactics and players, but sometimes it's necessary to change so that the team can evolve.There's a tendency to think players who've been great for us should never be sold but sometimes it's necessary so that the team can evolve.
I just don't follow the consensus that suggests he's indispensable. He's obviously been amazing for us, but he's nearly 30 and is an asset that will depreciate in value rapidly over the next 2-3 years.
He's not ever reached the levels he did during the centurions season. This season he's been pretty average on the whole and we've looked better when he's been out of the side. So if we are ever going to sell him to make room for another clutch player it would make sense to do so this summer.
I don't judge Kev for ball retention the same way I don't judge David for not being a great header of the ball. Different players have different characteristics. It's not like Bernardo Silva is capable of producing 80 yard assists 20 times a season and unselfishly he has sacrificed that creativity for running around the pitch. He can't provide what Kevin can, so he gives the team what he does best - a fantastic work ethic, incredible counter-pressing and physicality in the middle of the pitch.I've watched the game twice now and debating whether anyone else was worse is pointless. Some of the others had numerous brainfarts but Kev was consistently fucking toss outside of a ten minute spell in the second half. He might as well have been wearing red.