2 seasons of Messi or 4 of Kane?

[Essex blue]

Fancy NYC sign him and we loan back on the cheap Lampard style to help with FFP. Kane still coming if Levy stops acting up

 

[Lavinda Past]

Simple....

Harry Kane wants to play for City and has put his reputation on the line to help make it happen.

Lionel Messi wants to play for Barcelona but can't, so he'll just pretend he wants to play for the highest bidder.

Kane 100% for me.

 

[hilts]

Simple....

Harry Kane wants to play for City and has put his reputation on the line to help make it happen.

Lionel Messi wants to play for Barcelona but can't, so he'll just pretend he wants to play for the highest bidder.

Kane 100% for me.

Yep

 

[Mancityus]

One of Messi over 5 of Kane.

 

[Essex blue]

No no no Kane over Messi, Kane has ambition and heart Messi wants money (like he needs more of it) and probably won’t have the fire anymore

 

[Sam1980]

Kane for me

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

We are the only club who could give him a five year contract , two at our club and three years at NYC , but does Messi want to commit to the blood and thunder of the premier league or go to PSG and play a couple of difficult games a season and play the rest of the season in his carpet slippers. At 34 i think he will take the easy option.

 

[berryblue]

Watching Kane trotting around the edge of the penalty area for England waiting for somebody to give him the ball makes me think he's not suitable to City's style of play. A £100+ million gamble?

 

[remember arthur mann]

Lionel all day long, Harry O'Kane is just a pretender.

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

Depending on what works of fiction you choose to believe in wages there’s an argument that 2 years of Messi (sans transfer fee) would be cheaper than 4 of Kane

what would be your choice?

Getting ahead of ourselves of here blues. We chased Geoff Thomas for years and we ended up with Nigel Clough. Very raggy thread