200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball Videobook MUST WATCH!

[lancs blue]

Fibre insulation LOL you would need feet of lead did you not watch the nasa vid i posted, bless.

Leaving aside the impracticality of large amounts of lead shielding on a spacecraft it would actually be more dangerous because of Brehmsstrahlung - if you don't know what that is google it but if you did know you would never have made the comment about lead shielding in the first place, "bless". Give me a direct link to the NASA comment you keep referring to because I really can't be arsed going through those vids looking for it.

Lead can be necessary to protect against extremely intense bursts of radiation - e.g.an atomic explosion OR an intense solar flare event which I mentioned in my initial post and as I explained there NASA decided to take the risk and do without additional shielding against such high-intensity but rare bursts of radiation. In the case of high-intensity radiation the Brehmsstrahlung effect from using lead or another material with a high atomic number is less dangerous than the high-intensity radiation itself. The Van Allen belts do not contain high-intensity bursts of radiation, they are largely composed of streams of high-energy protons and electrons, the majority of which can be stopped with relatively light shielding - yes, fibre insulation and aluminium sheeting to name two. Sure, some particles will get through but by passing quickly through the parts of the belt where the radiation levels are lower the danger to the astronauts was minimised.

 

[aguero93:20]

how does a plane flying at 500MPH catch up let alone overtake the earth spinning at 1000 MPH it can not that is impossible

Do you know what escape velocity is?

 

[SWP's back]

You're wasting your time. No-one is that stupid so he must be a troll.

Oh there are some so stupid that they believe the troll by the looks of it.

 

[SWP's back]

Never observed evolution, bless. Ever heard of peppered moths??? I suggest as a starting point for your research as you need to do a lot, then you might get a grasp on things.

Still waiting for you to smash the points raised, even if you have described observed phenomenon as silly already.

Or Lenski's work with e-coli bacteria.

 

[Cheesy]

1There is one pole not two please show me evidence of the other, you can not.2 everything rotates around the north star and we have used it for navigation for millennia and it has not moved 1" and we are exploding omnidirectional y from the big bang at 670 million mph but we dont observe any parallax LMAO 3 Thats just perspective 4 5 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/y4SkcMK94yw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 6 time-lapse photography proves FE you obviously dont understand what you believe, everything flying apart o 670 million MPH and not 1 " of parallax has EVER been observed there is that word again "OBSERVATION" you seem to be lacking it everywhere get used to that. 7 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XugZ9wGnk9M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 8 I agree the distances are well off New York to London 3,459 miles avarage flight speed 500 MPH, earths rotation 1000 mph(circa) from west to east, 1000+500 -closing speed 1500 mph that flight should take 2.3 hours and going the other way how does a plane flying at 500MPH catch up let alone overtake the earth spinning at 1000 MPH it can not that is impossible. 9 all the southern hemisphere flight are very odd <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yNVgzk3tbl0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 11 I am 6ft 2" and the horizon is 3.2 miles from me at that height you will always find that the horizon is always at eye level this can only happen on a plane on a ball the higher you go the lower the horizon appears until it under your feet <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Gu2vrxwCVWQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 12 if the moon that is 1/6 earth's gravity can effect all the sea why has it not been pulled in by earth's 6X gravitational field and why do NO lakes have tides because it's all bullshit and to be fare your question were silly, simplistic and childlike not the mention your insults but i know you are just a child who is about the have his rattle taken away so i forgive you but now we are going to kick it up a gear or two. I can tell you are not supersmart so I will give you some time to try to rebut these you had 12 I only have 5 1 michelson morley experiment 2 michelson gale pearson experiment 3 sagnac experiment 4 airy's failure experiment 5 The Bedford level experiment

Jesus fucking Christ, you must be on the wind up here. For a start you don't understand one iota of what you've just copied & pasted there :-D

Oh, and by the way.... lakes do have tides (as does every single body of water on the planet). The are just too small to notice particularly when taking into account local weather such as precipitation & wind.

 

[west didsblue]

Can you make that at least readable??

Would you bother reading it if it was? I can guarantee you'd be wasting your time.

 

[spanish blue]

Or Lenski's work with e-coli bacteria.

you can think you come from mud if you like but you do know it called The theory of evolution and i think you need some help with definitions
theorynoun [C or U]
uk /ˈθɪə.ri/ us /ˈθɪr.i/

B2 a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or, more generally, an opinion or explanation:

 

[spanish blue]

Do you know what escape velocity is?

Escape velocity lol here is a question for you how does a "space rocket thrust engine work in the vacume of space with nothing to thrust against??!! come on boys and girls is this all you have?

 

[spanish blue]

Jesus fucking Christ, you must be on the wind up here. For a start you don't understand one iota of what you've just copied & pasted there :-D

Oh, and by the way.... lakes do have tides (as does every single body of water on the planet). The are just too small to notice particularly when taking into account local weather such as precipitation & wind.

Lakes do not have tides not in this reality maybe in your world but I am sure you can provide evidence... no obviously you cant because you can not observe it just like all of your theory's no observation and that under the scientific method is disqualification lol.

 

[west didsblue]

Escape velocity lol here is a question for you how does a "space rocket thrust engine work in the vacume of space with nothing to thrust against??!! come on boys and girls is this all you have?

I must congratulate you on getting this thread up to 17 pages by getting people to respond to absolute drivel. Top wumming.