200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball Videobook MUST WATCH!

[spanish blue]

18 pages and counting. Keep up the good work. I don't think you're as thick as your postings suggest because that would be impossible.

I see you bring nothing to the debate come on smartarse do you have anything besides childish insults.... er no you dont obviously put up or shut up.

 

[SWP's back]

Halfwit you forgot to mention "OBSERVATION" Let me tell you how it works and I will take it slow for you
1 hypothesis
hʌɪˈpɒθɪsɪs/
noun
noun: hypothesis; plural noun: hypotheses

1. a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.
   "his ‘steady state’ hypothesis of the origin of the universe"
   synonyms: theory, theorem, thesis, conjecture, supposition, speculation, postulation, postulate, proposition, premise, surmise, assumption, presumption, presupposition;More
   notion, concept, idea, contention, opinion, view, belief
   "his ‘steady state’ hypothesis of the origin of the universe"
   • Philosophy
     a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth.
     "the hypothesis that every event has a cause"

2 Observation
3 After observation your Hypothesis is either consolidated, extrapolated or ERADICATED so please show me some, ANY confirming observations for the ball but you can not so I wont hold my breath and dont respond unless you have something to bring to the table you are just a child.

Haha. Well done.

I thought for a bit you were just a fucking idiot, but I've finally seen you are just trolling. Well done you. A bit sad you did it on NYE rather than spend time with family and friends, but fair play, you've nearly made 20 pages.

 

[lancs blue]

Thats twice you have said that Appolo had shielding where is your evidence or proof FFS, you bring a claim you bring the proof you have nothing, if you have it show me!

The shielding was inherently in the structure of the craft as I've tried to explain!

Polyethylene is the choice of particle shielding today, and various substances were available to the Apollo engineers to absorb Van Allen radiation. The fibrous insulation between the inner and outer hulls of the command module was likely the most effective form of radiation shielding. When metals must be used in spacecraft (e.g., for structural strength) then a lighter metal such as aluminum is better than heavier metals such as steel or lead. The lower the atomic number, the less Bremsstrahlung.

The notion that only vast amounts of a very heavy metal could shield against Van Allen belt radiation is a good indicator of how poorly though out the conspiracist radiation case is. What the conspiracists say is the only way of shielding against the Van Allen belt radiation turns out to be the worst way to attempt to do it!

http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html

 

[Cheesy]

Lakes do not have tides not in this reality maybe in your world but I am sure you can provide evidence... no obviously you cant because you can not observe it just like all of your theory's no observation and that under the scientific method is disqualification lol.

I'm not sure if this is wortwhile or not because, like the majority of your ilk, you'll probably just dismiss it as made up to reinforce The Agenda.

This is from the NOAA website...

True tides—changes in water level caused by the gravitational forces of the sun and moon—do occur in a semi-diurnal (twice daily) pattern on the Great Lakes. Studies indicate that the Great Lakes spring tide, the largest tides caused by the combined forces of the sun and moon, is less than five centimeters in height. These minor variations are masked by the greater fluctuations in lake levels produced by wind and barometric pressure changes.

 

[Elbow beards]

Escape velocity lol here is a question for you how does a "space rocket thrust engine work in the vacume of space with nothing to thrust against??!! come on boys and girls is this all you have?

Newton's third law, chimp

 

[crazyg]

Dont believe understand the former is a belief system and only for fools now if you are telling me that you can see the ISS which is no bigger than a football pitch from 250 miles against the blackness of space LMAO you are either superman or a fool and I think we both know the answer to that one, lol

Do you normally insult people who have a different opinion to yourself? If I was to call you a fool for what you are saying, you would no doubt take umbrage in my remark.

You say I have never seen an photo from space, just an image. Presumably, in your world, anyone taking a photograph is merely stealing the soul of the person being photographed, or, if of a building, that building is just an image, and not real. Deary me.

You claim that " you are either....................to that one". I must defend myself here and point out that although I DO wear my underpants outside my trousers, that is merely a personal affectation. A fool I am not, but I suspect you may well be.

Anyway, enough of this frivolity, Believe what you want, sunshine. Why let the facts stand in the way of your delusion?

 

[Cheesy]

Newton's third law, chimp

Sorry, but we all know Newton was a founder member of them.

 

[west didsblue]

I see you bring nothing to the debate come on smartarse do you have anything besides childish insults.... er no you dont obviously put up or shut up.

It's not a debate. Most people are just laughing at your apparent stupidity.
For it to be a debate, it would require people to take you seriously.

 

[Metal Biker]

 

[Paul Lake's Left Knee]

1There is one pole not two please show me evidence of the other, you can not.2 everything rotates around the north star and we have used it for navigation for millennia and it has not moved 1" and we are exploding omnidirectional y from the big bang at 670 million mph but we dont observe any parallax LMAO 3 Thats just perspective 4 5 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/y4SkcMK94yw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 6 time-lapse photography proves FE you obviously dont understand what you believe, everything flying apart o 670 million MPH and not 1 " of parallax has EVER been observed there is that word again "OBSERVATION" you seem to be lacking it everywhere get used to that. 7 <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/XugZ9wGnk9M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 8 I agree the distances are well off New York to London 3,459 miles avarage flight speed 500 MPH, earths rotation 1000 mph(circa) from west to east, 1000+500 -closing speed 1500 mph that flight should take 2.3 hours and going the other way how does a plane flying at 500MPH catch up let alone overtake the earth spinning at 1000 MPH it can not that is impossible. 9 all the southern hemisphere flight are very odd <iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/yNVgzk3tbl0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 11 I am 6ft 2" and the horizon is 3.2 miles from me at that height you will always find that the horizon is always at eye level this can only happen on a plane on a ball the higher you go the lower the horizon appears until it under your feet <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Gu2vrxwCVWQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> 12 if the moon that is 1/6 earth's gravity can effect all the sea why has it not been pulled in by earth's 6X gravitational field and why do NO lakes have tides because it's all bullshit and to be fare your question were silly, simplistic and childlike not the mention your insults but i know you are just a child who is about the have his rattle taken away so i forgive you but now we are going to kick it up a gear or two. I can tell you are not supersmart so I will give you some time to try to rebut these you had 12 I only have 5 1 michelson morley experiment 2mi chelson gale pearson experiment 3 sagnac experiment 4 airy's failure experiment 5 The Bedford level experiment Good luck you will need it the entire scientific community have fail to address these in hundreds of years because it's flat simple as that.

I've tried to read your copy and pasting. Its not easy, bit like you. Unlike you (because you said they were all lies) I didnt use videos or pictures, seems its alright for you though.

You havent argued against the majority of the points raised at all. If you think you can, please try again in an eligible and clear manner, completely ironic you calling my clear and precise post as child like, when yours looks like its been done by a 2 year old.

There is plenty of evidence for the south pole, the magnetic field of the planet is that of a dipole, you can say all you want but compasses dont lie and without 2 poles we wouldnt observe the magnetic fields we do.

The fact you dont think that Polaris moves is wrong, again, try and do some research on this fact. It moves throughout the day and night. If you took its picture, you’d find that it makes its own little circle around the exact point of the north celestial pole every day. That’s because the North Star is really offset a little – by about three-quarters of a degree – from celestial north, something that is observed from earth very very easily.

As for the bit on aeroplanes, i really couldnt follow, but newton's third law covers what i think you are trying to say shouldnt happen.

Lakes have tides, again, your lack of knowledge is letting you down, having seen the great lakes with my own eyes I know this to be a fact, but as you love you tube, there are lots of videos showing them, waves and all.