2020 US Elections

[MillionMilesAway]

Do these people think nobody will check?

Has it been redesignated as Greater Michigan?

 

[Ric]

I've tidied the thread up now as it was getting a bit out of hand, so let's try and keep it civil and on topic moving forward. Cheers.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Under normal circumstances I'd never in a million years quote a tweet by an actor, even one as smart as Edward Norton, but this thread right here is a pretty interesting take on the current situation (and I've been known to play a hand or two of Texas Hold 'Em). Worth the one minute it takes to read.

 

[DrBlueBob]

Under normal circumstances I'd never in a million years quote a tweet by an actor, even one as smart as Edward Norton, but this thread right here is a pretty interesting take on the current situation (and I've been known to play a hand or two of Texas Hold 'Em). Worth the one minute it takes to read.

On the likely assumption that Edward Norton is correct, it would seem as though the complicit nature of his enablers indicates they are also in deep shit.

 

[somapop]

I think we may be getting that OJ Simpson chase down the freeway in SUV after all.
Vaccines almost nailed, Trump out, some great drone footage of him running for his life...things looking up for 2021?

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

On the likely assumption that Edward Norton is correct, it would seem as though the complicit nature of his enablers indicates they are also in deep shit.

All along my perspective has been that the biggest risk to Trump is the SDNY case on tax/bank fraud where I feel confident he misrepresented his financial position to either the IRS, Deutsche Bank or more likely both. I'd still suggest his enablers are in it more for their post-Trump careers as serial grifters but as usual where there is one cockroach there are more and things are always worse than they see, underneath the surface. I think what we'll uncover in Trump's staff is as much incompetence as there is illegality. Like all mobsters though, as Norton refers to him, prosecutors want to be able to catch him at one crime -- the most provable one -- as opposed to all the terrible ones committed.

 

[super_city_si]

He is not having a good time is he ?Borat, hair dye, the election and being clinically insane.

How could you leave out the epic 4 seasons landscaping news conference?

 

[bluethrunthru]

Simon Marks on the Eddie Mair show daily at this time is brilliant - he is their US correspondent - very incisive and very entertaining in his language - just referring to Rudi as a clown and Sidney Powell as a nutcase ha ha
He just played Tucker Carlsson jumping off the Trump train last night saying were Tucker a deep sea diver he'd be surfacing so fast he's in danger of getting the bends ha ha ha

 

[domalino]

Under normal circumstances I'd never in a million years quote a tweet by an actor, but this thread right here is a pretty interesting take on the current situation (and I've been known to play a hand or two of Texas Hold 'Em). Worth the one minute it takes to read.

For what it's worth quite a few former FBI/CIA/Prosecutors in the media have also put forward similar theories.

So Norton might not be qualified himself but people who are think similarly to him.

 

[DrBlueBob]

All along my perspective has been that the biggest risk to Trump is the SDNY case on tax/bank fraud where I feel confident he misrepresented his financial position to either the IRS, Deutsche Bank or more likely both. I'd still suggest his enablers are in it more for their post-Trump careers as serial grifters but as usual where there is one cockroach there are more and things are always worse than they see, underneath the surface. I think what we'll uncover in Trump's staff is as much incompetence as there is illegality. Like all mobsters though, as Norton refers to him, prosecutors want to be able to catch him at one crime -- the most provable one -- as opposed to all the terrible ones committed.

Pretty much my takeaway as well. Is doesn't necessarily matter what you get him for. That sounds almost like there's a witch hunt. :-)

 

[super_city_si]

Arrest her. Try her. Convict her. Incarcerate her.

So you're saying "lock her up"?

 

[kaz7]

Any news on states verifiying now ?

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

So you're saying "lock her up"?

After and assuming the first three things.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

We could save a lot of time. Send Trump to prison now and give him all Georgia’s ballots to count for the rest of his life.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

But what do you suggest? If the President isn't going to abide by the rules, laws, traditions, and history of his predecessors, and his party is going to be complicit in ignoring them and enable such, what Constitution is fit for purpose? Anyhow, I'm not sure I agree -- the courts are doing what they are supposed to thus far; this isn't going anywhere. It's a pantomime. A pantomime that will allow Trump and his supporters to live in a fantasy land where they had the election stolen. And -- far more importantly -- will allow Trump and those in on the Trump con to fleece the snot out of the hapless.

What use is your right to bear arms, if you’re not allowed shoot the ****?

2nd amendment, my arse.

 

[mrbelfry]

Do these people think nobody will check?

Do the errors in the affidavit mean the rest of it isn't accurate? Is the voting system as insecure as the document states?

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

 

[MillionMilesAway]

Do the errors in the affidavit mean the rest of it isn't accurate? Is the voting system as insecure as the document states?

It apparently thinks half of Minnesota is in Michigan - clearly insecure!

 

[mrbelfry]

Ummmmm, mate, if the evidence cited for the conclusion that the system is insecure in Michigan comes entirely from "data" from townships in FUCKING MINNESOTA, I don't think we really need to concern ourselves with trusting the remainder of what this consultant errrr liar errrr fraud errrr grifter errr human piece of giraffe shit wrote.

He's bad at geography doesn't mean he is bad at computers. My main reason to ask is I am friends with a Trumper who uncritically repeats all of his election claims. I'd like to be able to challenge his assertions

 

[west didsblue]

He's bad at geography doesn't mean he is bad at computers. My main reason to ask is I am friends with a Trumper who uncritically repeats all of his election claims. I'd like to be able to challenge his assertions

I’d tell him to fuck off and make some new friends with people who aren’t complete idiots.