FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
I read this last sentence five times, and I still have no idea what you're trying to say.I'm not referring to his worst excesses - more things like the 'I could call the BP CEO no problem, I could get that money, sell him a permit, I'd get that money' story that went around. He was saying how he didn't want to do it. There are quite a few examples of this. Shooting someone and getting away with it. He definitely wasn't saying that was a good thing. When people have a hate figure in mind, winding that audience up pays off handsomely for the media. Sometimes, we are the ones not quite doing our research.
I mean, he was heavily criticised for saying he'd won on the night. But the grammatical content of his remark was hardly significantly different in content to some of the statements made by the Biden camp.
Damocles a long time ago said we needed to calm down. He was right. Unfortunately, due to the high emotional and psychological demands involved in admitting that to myself, and finding the kernel of truth, whilst still understanding and being true to my POV that Damocles needed to understand the truths in why some of us truly feared and loathed him, I never really was able to, until a few days back, when I made peace with the chance of America more or less mandating another four years of Trump's willfully divisive and destructive attacks on fairness and the practice of mutual respect between individuals, and his sustained attacks on the institutions that protect citizens regardless of their affiliation or any other facet of their identity or status.
The fact that you are somehow trying to justify "maybe I should go fuck Joe's wife, and then knife Hunter" as acceptable rhetoric because, you know, he never did it, makes me question whether I should care what you're trying to say.
The "Damo was right" sentence doesn't help either (news flash: Damo was completely fucking wrong).
Last edited:
