meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 7,019
We really are a hypocritical bunch. I have never been less interested in a world cup but the virtue signalling from the media and others makes me sick. I don't believe Quatar should have been given the world cup for purely football reasons but bloody hell, Russia had it last time and I don't remember all of the hand wringing and gnashing of teeth that has accompanied this one. Maybe we should concentrate on sorting ourselves out before trying to apply our own perfect standards on others. Lets thank our lucky stars the competition isn't being held in AD.
From the Guardian:
Qatar only managed to manoeuvre itself into this prime position by soliciting the support of powerful states that have fast-tracked its passage into polite society. It is armed to the teeth by the UK, Europe and the US, and is a joint venturer in monumental, lucrative financial and real-estate transactions on European soil. The state of Qatar is the 10th largest landowner in Britain. Since it won the right to host the World Cup, it has been granted billions of pounds of weapons sales licences, including sophisticated surveillance equipment, by Britain.
There is a special relationship with London in particular, and it can be seen in the Westminster ledger of declared gifts. In the run up to the World Cup, the value of Qatar’s gifts to British MPs was greater than the amount spent by all the other 15 countries whose governments made donations to British MPs combined. The Conservative MP David Mundell, the first openly gay Tory cabinet minister, accepted hospitality worth £7,473 from Qatar, and then, in a parliamentary debate a few months later, in response to concern raised by another MP about LGBTQ+ rights in Qatar, said that Qatar’s critics should “focus their energies on the handling of LGBT issues in professional football in the UK”.
To be fair, there was similar criticism when Russia had it.