#25 | Fernandinho - 2020/2021 Performances

[kun]

We looks so much better with Dinho in the team instead of Rodri. Last 30 mins proved that as he offers so much more going forward. He also doesn’t take 4 touches to not actually go anywhere, which is what Rodri does.

Fernandinho was coming on fresh against a tired team, and we were leading.

 

[FantasyIreland]

A very welcome sight and reassuring presence when we are wntering the closing stages of a game.Hopefully the club know the player who will be replacing him.

 

[domalino]

Correlation doesn't imply causation, yankee doodle. Completely illogical statement.

Between completely incorrect use of correlation vs. causation and thinking I'm American, and trying to use that as an insult its hard to imagine how you could have been more wrong in such a short comment.

 

[Deleted member 77198]

Ah how I wish Fernandinho was in his 20s. He’s got so much more to his game than Rodri, even at 53 years old.

 

[ws01]

Between completely incorrect use of correlation vs. causation and thinking I'm American, and trying to use that as an insult its hard to imagine how you could have been more wrong in such a short comment.

You're implying that a supporter is incorrect in his/her observation that we were better/looked better as a result of Fernandinho being on the field, rather than Rodri, because the goals and more chances came whilst Rodri was on the pitch.

Thus, you're assuming that the correlation between the events are, in whatever part, credited to Rodri's presence. You've taken a bunch of variables and deduced a cause and effect relationship between them, based on an observation. That is the definition of someone thinking correlation equals causation.

You're wrong, as you usually are.

 

[domalino]

You're implying that a supporter is incorrect in his/her observation that we were better/looked better as a result of Fernandinho being on the field, rather than Rodri, because the goals and more chances came whilst Rodri was on the pitch.

Thus, you're assuming that the correlation between the events are, in whatever part, credited to Rodri's presence. You've taken a bunch of variables and deduced a cause and effect relationship between them, based on an observation. That is the definition of someone thinking correlation equals causation.

You're wrong, as you usually are.

No, no one at any point said more chances happened when Rodri was on the pitch because he was on the pitch. You've completely invented the correlation. I simply pointed out the fact that vast majority of our chances happened and both goals happened in the 55 minutes Rodri was on.

If you just read things instead of getting half way through and then concocting a fictional ending, you'd be so much better off.

 

[ws01]

No, no one at any point said more chances happened when Rodri was on the pitch because he was on the pitch. You've completely invented the correlation. I simply pointed out the fact that vast majority of our chances happened and both goals happened in the 55 minutes Rodri was on.

If you just read things instead of getting half way through and then concocting a fictional ending, you'd be so much better off.

Nope.

 

[Dax777]

You're implying that a supporter is incorrect in his/her observation that we were better/looked better as a result of Fernandinho being on the field, rather than Rodri, because the goals and more chances came whilst Rodri was on the pitch.

Thus, you're assuming that the correlation between the events are, in whatever part, credited to Rodri's presence. You've taken a bunch of variables and deduced a cause and effect relationship between them, based on an observation. That is the definition of someone thinking correlation equals causation.

You're wrong, as you usually are.

Yikes! You are really bad at this.

 

[Dr Jacoby]

Great performance.

 

[Bobby Heaton Moor]

What an absolute legend of our club this man is. 35 years of age, to perform like that in such a big game....lost for words here. Incredible performance