You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
25 | Gianluigi Donnarumma - 2025/26
- Thread starter Sebi
- Start date
He saved us a few times and was just trying to close the angle down on Martinelli. Unfortunately it’s a brilliant finish. Just one of those things.
But, dare I say, that defensive performance from the side stems from the confidence they have in the guy in the sticks behind them.
But, dare I say, that defensive performance from the side stems from the confidence they have in the guy in the sticks behind them.
The Norfolk Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2021
- Messages
- 795
- Team supported
- Man City
It’s Ake (again) playing him on that was at fault … Gigi was immense again, and dominated the box when facing their biggest weapon i.e. corners.All that only to get chipped like that in stoppage time, so frustrating because he was so good.
OrigamiNinja
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 11,151
If the defence stays deep, Donna isn’t so far out. I don’t know why there was a sudden change in approach but it’s cost us. They could have played all day and not scored, they created next-to-nothing in open play.
He was.It’s Ake (again) playing him on that was at fault … Gigi was immense again, and dominated the box when facing their biggest weapon i.e. corners.
That's what's pisses me off, just why did they decide to do that at that moment ? they were never scoring with our parked bus.If the defence stays deep, Donna isn’t so far out. I don’t know why there was a sudden change in approach but it’s cost us. They could have played all day and not scored, they created next-to-nothing in open play.
Gaz76
Well-Known Member
He's going to be huge for us, maybe should have stayed back for the goal but Ake dropping back was totally different to the game we had played all the way through
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 19,240
Thought he was decent, but for the goal he was in no man’s land.
The defence was too far forward as well
The defence was too far forward as well
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 27,155
- Team supported
- City
Played well and im glad we bought him but Eddie would have got absolute pelters for that goal
chris85mcfc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2013
- Messages
- 6,948
Excellent overall again and you can see what he's brought to our back line, who have been floundering for a long time
Comical to play a high line leaving the keeper no choice but to come out and make it difficult for Martinelli
Comical to play a high line leaving the keeper no choice but to come out and make it difficult for Martinelli
haahaaland
New Member
- Joined
- 10 Apr 2024
- Messages
- 1
Initially thought he came out because Martinelli was through on goal and he tried to make it harder for him score, but watched the goal back and it's the opposite. Ake is caught sleeping, but Gvardiol makes the angle tight for Martinelli. It's barely a chance. Completely brain dead decision to come out which is classic Donnarumma (take the good with the bad), but he should've never been put in that position. You can't play a high line when there's no press. Shame on Savinho for not putting in the dirty work and Reijnders for trying to dribble instead of manage the game properly.
Regardless, that was objectively a good performance by him. You can see how comfortable the defence is with him behind them.
Regardless, that was objectively a good performance by him. You can see how comfortable the defence is with him behind them.
That's the type of goal Eddy conceded many times, I think Donna was surprised with how high we were all of a sudden and got caught in no man's land.Played well and im glad we bought him but Eddie would have got absolute pelters for that goal
Played well and im glad we bought him but Eddie would have got absolute pelters for that goal
Ake's fault for playing Martinelli on.
With ederson in goal we’d have got beat no question .Played well and im glad we bought him but Eddie would have got absolute pelters for that goal
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 41,954
Initially thought he came out because Martinelli was through on goal and he tried to make it harder for him score, but watched the goal back and it's the opposite. Ake is caught sleeping, but Gvardiol makes the angle tight for Martinelli. It's barely a chance. Completely brain dead decision to come out which is classic Donnarumma (take the good with the bad), but he should've never been put in that position. You can't play a high line when there's no press. Shame on Savinho for not putting in the dirty work and Reijnders for trying to dribble instead of manage the game properly.
Regardless, that was objectively a good performance by him. You can see how comfortable the defence is with him behind them.
Sooner we get rid of Savinho the better. He is stinking the place out currently.
jamielowndes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 2,770
If he isn't out of position that one time...
Phenomenal game from him in goal. Distribution wasn't great, although there seems to be a connection with Haaland on the old school "route 1 to the big man up top". But his actual goalkeeping was fantastic.
Phenomenal game from him in goal. Distribution wasn't great, although there seems to be a connection with Haaland on the old school "route 1 to the big man up top". But his actual goalkeeping was fantastic.
ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 22,194
Had a good game overall but he's completely at fault for that goal and cost us 2 points. Ederson would have been massacred if that were him.
Trying to blame the defence makes no sense. He hasn't gone clean through, even if youre saying its a mistake in the back line, Gvardiol gets back and is forcing Martinelli to go wide. If the keeper isn't out of position, Gvardiol either pushes him right out wide away from danger or he tries to hit it from a very difficult angle where you'd always back the keeper to comfortably save it. He was miles out of position and it's cost us the win.
Trying to blame the defence makes no sense. He hasn't gone clean through, even if youre saying its a mistake in the back line, Gvardiol gets back and is forcing Martinelli to go wide. If the keeper isn't out of position, Gvardiol either pushes him right out wide away from danger or he tries to hit it from a very difficult angle where you'd always back the keeper to comfortably save it. He was miles out of position and it's cost us the win.
Played well and im glad we bought him but Eddie would have got absolute pelters for that goal
Mainly because that goal happened loads of times with Ed in goal. Repeated issues is what ends up bringing criticism - if this happens multiple times for Donnarumma then he'll get it too I'm sure.
He would have been, but he would probaly let a few of the others in !Had a good game overall but he's completely at fault for that goal and cost us 2 points. Ederson would have been massacred if that were him.
Trying to blame the defence makes no sense. He hasn't gone clean through, even if youre saying its a mistake in the back line, Gvardiol gets back and is forcing Martinelli to go wide. If the keeper isn't out of position, Gvardiol either pushes him right out wide away from danger or he tries to hit it from a very difficult angle where you'd always back the keeper to comfortably save it. He was miles out of position and it's cost us the win.
Not being funny mate but with ederson in goal I doubt we’d have even got to 90 mins without conceding .Had a good game overall but he's completely at fault for that goal and cost us 2 points. Ederson would have been massacred if that were him.
Trying to blame the defence makes no sense. He hasn't gone clean through, even if youre saying its a mistake in the back line, Gvardiol gets back and is forcing Martinelli to go wide. If the keeper isn't out of position, Gvardiol either pushes him right out wide away from danger or he tries to hit it from a very difficult angle where you'd always back the keeper to comfortably save it. He was miles out of position and it's cost us the win.