Lots of differing opinions on here today, many leaning towards writing Raheem off completely. It's bizarre that both Pep and Southgate disagree with the nay-sayers and still see him as an important cog in the wheel.
If Pep has given up on Raheem, why hasn't he played Torres more? Why doesn't he use Jesus as first choice wide left man? Why doesn't he played Zinchenko in a more advanced role? It's not as though we don't have plenty of alternatives!
Indeed, if Raheem has been poor for 18 months as some suggest on here, why hasn't he already been offloaded?
I can only assume that it's because Pep and Southgate see something many City fans don't.
I have no doubt that there are a few potential buyers out there for Raheem. If he does go, you can bet they'd end up paying £70m+ for him. The upcoming new contract negotiations will be interesting, and will give an indication on how important City see Raheem for our future.