manctheknife
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 1,993
Actually of course there were plenty who did charge in, lest we forget..When you put it that way, it kinda kills the arguement for a controlled explosion.
Actually of course there were plenty who did charge in, lest we forget..When you put it that way, it kinda kills the arguement for a controlled explosion.
I found it a bit odd that in Washington where maximum security is everywhere, there is no footage of the plane that hit the pentagon apart from that one from cctv that was very grainy. Surely near the Pentagon there would be cameras everywhere and wouldn't someone on the ground see a plane flying low and take some pictures. Unless there are some that I haven't seen or the Pentagon is in the middle of nowhere.
200 tonnes of anything travelling at 250 knots will cause a lot of damage particularly if half that weight is a flammable liquid.Just one amongst many dodgy 9/11 claims for me was that the Pentagon 'plane' punched through a number of seperarate reinforced concrete walls and left a neat exit hole in the inner ring wall... airliners are incredibly fragile things, especially the nose cone which can easily be severely damaged just by a bird strike, yet somehow the nose cone of this particular airliner was strong enough to punch clean through several reinforced concrete walls.
I'd genuinely welcome someone offering me a rational explanation of how this was possible.
There's is footage, they've just never released it and made it confidential for some reason
And wasn't the part of the Pentagon that was ht also involved in the investigation of this missing money?
It stinks if anyone takes the time to dig a little,
This alone should make people question a number of points.
CorrectAny one who genuinely believes the US government let 9/11 happen is deluded as fuck.
Correct