Of course the more logical explanation is that the BBC were part of a huge cover up involving thousands of people and the passport was planted along with other debris you might not expect to find. Without the passport we'd never have known who the hijackers were obviously.Those links don't excuse or explain anything.
You may not find it weird or suspicious that a building collapse was reported 30 mins before it happened, or that a passport of a hijacker - out of all the billions of pieces of debris - was found intact in the rubble but I do.
That's fine, I'm not trying to win an argument or change minds here.
People believed in the gulf of tonkin incident too. Until they didn't.
Of course the more logical explanation is that the BBC were part of a huge cover up involving thousands of people and the passport was planted along with other debris you might not expect to find. Without the passport we'd never have known who the hijackers were obviously.
It's clear that the US government decided to destroy a large area of their biggest city, attack its own defence HQ and kill thousands of its own people to justify a war it wanted to wage in another part of the world because the USA have never taken part in any wars without justifying them by murdering large numbers of its population.
The trouble with using live news reports are that they are live and people make honest mistakes. Those mistakes are then rerun and shown as part of the conspiracy - Sandy Hook for example, the news reported X amount of shooters when there was only Y number, that then leads people to suggest the Police let people get away who were in on it
That said, it's all a bit fishy - 12 blokes in a cave came up with this and executed it, more or less, to perfection without any help whatsoever?
And that's physics is it....look mate, I'm parking this, but I have no issue on the WT7 theories. ..that was probably pulled.
I'm only questioning the strange minds of the conspiracy theorists.
The thing is, the 9/11 atrocity was awful enough in itself. Isn't the truth enough for them?
Take any moment in time, imagine a scenario, and you could cobble together some claptrap about helicopter pilots firing missiles and whatever else you want to put into the mix to 'prove' your point.
They watch too many films and believe James Bond is a real life person, some sort of secret club rules the world, the queen is a lizard, and it's just complete bollocks.
They believe it, I don't, and as I wrote, people have consciences. It is impossible that an inside job like 9/11 organised and carried out by the US government so many years ago would by now not have had someone spilling the beans.
Think about it?
Nobody has said anything because nobody was 'in on it'. It wasn't an organised act by the US government any more than the 7/7 bombings in London were organised by MI5.
They were acts of terrorism carried out by lunatics with warped minds. There is nothing else it could be, whatever your view of the press.
Conspiracy theories exist and persist because there was no conspiracy and nobody can come come forward and admit it happened, and they exploit that.
The conspiracy theorists also say we never landed on the moon .
Are you one?
Go to Heaton Park and talk to the Astronomy club. I'm sure they will point their scopes at the moon for you like they did with my mate.
He was shown the left over landing craft and the rover .
He's normal again now.
No, physics is the bit that shoots down the official story that in number one tower a large block of the top crushed down the rest of the building; see Newtons third law as to why this will not float.
We were talking about WT7, you now say it was "probably pulled" and on the evidence of video and simple math that is a reasonable theory, but then it brings us back to your comment on the logistics because it is simply impossible to drop a building like that without days of prep using tons of explosives.
I`m sure there are explanation for a lot of it, but after more than three thousand people died there are so many inconsistencies that have been ignored or swept under the carpet as to raise serious doubts on what did happen on that day, an you dont have to be a tinfoil hat wearer to see that.
At no stage did I say the top of the building 'crushed' down the rest...No, physics is the bit that shoots down the official story that in number one tower a large block of the top crushed down the rest of the building; see Newtons third law as to why this will not float.
We were talking about WT7, you now say it was "probably pulled" and on the evidence of video and simple math that is a reasonable theory, but then it brings us back to your comment on the logistics because it is simply impossible to drop a building like that without days of prep using tons of explosives.
I`m sure there are explanation for a lot of it, but after more than three thousand people died there are so many inconsistencies that have been ignored or swept under the carpet as to raise serious doubts on what did happen on that day, an you dont have to be a tinfoil hat wearer to see that.