I'd always thought that the 9/11 conspiracies were the most far fetched of the lot .
Some questions do need answering though.
Why does the official report say that the steel structure melted due to the burning jet fuel?
Jet fuel burns at a maximum of 1800 degrees. Steel can only melt in a blast furnace at 3000 degrees. The only thing that can generate that much heat is thermite (used in demolition). It can provide it's own oxygen supply and can carry on burning under water. The twin towers site carried on burning for 92 days after the attack despite being immersed in water. Thermite was found in abundance in the dust.
Even if you want to believe that burning jet fuel brought the towers down, how does that bring down tower 7?
Why were fighter jets ordered to stay grounded, completely against standard
protocol?
Why was there no evidence of a plane crash at the site of the supposed flight 93 crash?
Some questions do need answering though.
Why does the official report say that the steel structure melted due to the burning jet fuel?
Jet fuel burns at a maximum of 1800 degrees. Steel can only melt in a blast furnace at 3000 degrees. The only thing that can generate that much heat is thermite (used in demolition). It can provide it's own oxygen supply and can carry on burning under water. The twin towers site carried on burning for 92 days after the attack despite being immersed in water. Thermite was found in abundance in the dust.
Even if you want to believe that burning jet fuel brought the towers down, how does that bring down tower 7?
Why were fighter jets ordered to stay grounded, completely against standard
protocol?
Why was there no evidence of a plane crash at the site of the supposed flight 93 crash?