Wonder where the 9/11 museum in New York got all those aircraft parts from if it vapourised.
Ebay.Wonder where the 9/11 museum in New York got all those aircraft parts from if it vapourised.
The wing hitting the ground is news to me...and if it did the impact with the wall would have been different.
Why wasn't the hole as wide as a 757's 124-ft.-10-in. wingspan? A crashing jet doesn't punch a cartoon-like outline of itself into a reinforced concrete building, says ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University. In this case, one wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns, explains Sozen, who specializes in the behavior of concrete buildings. What was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass. "If you expected the entire wing to cut into the building," Sozen tells PM, "it didn't happen."
All sorts of small items survived the crash. Why should a hijackers passport be any less likely to survive than anything else?If you want to believe in the billions to one chance that a magic passport not only survived the impact but floated to earth ready to be discovered fair enough. Not just any passport, but a hijackers passport. Never mind everything else.
That's fine. You choose to believe the official conspiracy theory, I don't.
No harm, no foul.
Back to today and more important matters: 3-0 - Kelechi brace, and DeBruyne.
The aeroplane was travelling at 460 knots; about the speed of a bullet. Security camera frame rates aren't very fast and would have been much slower in 2001 than now so it's no great surprise that not much was recorded. Smart phones hadn't been invented yet but there were plenty of witnesses who saw it happen; something the conspiracy theorists like to ignore.Only thing that gets me with the Pentagon plane hit is its arguably the most covered cctv wise building in America, including the surrounding area yet we dont have a single film of the plane coming in and hitting the building other than a grainy clip that still manages to not show a plane hitting.
Just not having that at all.
The aeroplane was travelling at 460 knots; about the speed of a bullet. Security camera frame rates aren't very fast and would have been much slower in 2001 than now so it's no great surprise that not much was recorded. Smart phones hadn't been invented yet but there were plenty of witnesses who saw it happen; something the conspiracy theorists like to ignore.
Depends on the type of gun. Most are much faster but not all.A bullet travels much much faster than a plane mate, trust me and whilst the quality of cctv might not have been fantastic then as compared to today, the systems in place around the pentagon will have been the best there is, military grade in quality.
Im not saying the plane didnt hit the building, im just not having it that they dont have far better footage available and i wonder why it isnt being shown?
Depends on the type of gun. Most are much faster but not all.