9/11 documentary now

2sheikhs said:
I said before.
There were interviews with people prior to 9/11 saying vans were turning up at 3am regularly. When they inquired, they were told it was for lift shaft maintenance. Other workers had also complained about lots of dust in the offices when they arrived in the mornings.
Who'd question people working overnight so as not to disturb office workers during the day?
Click to expand...
Any links?
 
I suppose that the railway workers behind the fence when Kennedy was shot were genuine too, even though the signal box worker said he'd never seen them before.

Nobody questions people doing maintenance work at night. It's safer and more convenient.
 
QUOTE="west didsblue, post: 9768204, member: 43716"]Any links?[/QUOTE]
Do the research for yourself. I'm not trawling through the net to post a link just so you can watch it and then claim that the people in question are lying or the date on the film has been changed .
 
2sheikhs said:
I suppose that the railway workers behind the fence when Kennedy was shot were genuine too, even though the signal box worker said he'd never seen them before.

Nobody questions people doing maintenance work at night. It's safer and more convenient.
Click to expand...
So you reckon that the people manning the entrance to the underground car parks would just wave in vans loaded with explosives? Or do you think they parked in the street and just carried them in?
How long were they working on it? Thousands of charges would need to be placed. Miles of detonation cord would need to be installed. The charges would have needed to be placed in specific places to ensure success and the cord would have needed to be plane crash resistant! All these thousands of charges and miles of detonation cord would also have had to be hidden.
Also they'd have to get past security which was significantly tightened after 26 Feb 1993 when someone actually did drive in with a bomb and attempted to destroy the twin towers. Not just once but dozens of times.
It all seems really plausible.
 
2sheikhs said:
Do the research for yourself. I'm not trawling through the net to post a link just so you can watch it and then claim that the people in question are lying or the date on the film has been changed .
Click to expand...
I have done. You're talking bollocks.
 
You answer me a question or two West didsbury.
How does a passport belonging to one of the hijackers survive a fire that's apparently hot enough to melt steel?
Even if you want to say that on impact, lots of items got blown out of the windows and fell to the ground, did it jump out of his pocket first or unzip his hand luggage ?
I've not checked what name was on it but I hope it didn't say, Muhammed Atta - nationally -Saudi Arabia. That would be too comical for one of the world's most wanted men to carry around his genuine id.
Thinking about it, maybe he had it in his hand because he knew he was about to land and check in.
 
2sheikhs said:
You answer me a question or two West didsbury.
How does a passport belonging to one of the hijackers survive a fire that's apparently hot enough to melt steel?
Even if you want to say that on impact, lots of items got blown out of the windows and fell to the ground, did it jump out of his pocket first or unzip his hand luggage ?
I've not checked what name was on it but I hope it didn't say, Muhammed Atta - nationally -Saudi Arabia. That would be too comical for one of the world's most wanted men to carry around his genuine id.
Thinking about it, maybe he had it in his hand because he knew he was about to land and check in.
Click to expand...
It belonged to Satam al-Suqami. I haven't a clue how it survived, however parts of the plane were projected out of the other side of the building straight after the impact and weren't in the building long enough to be in the fire so why shouldn't it be amongst some of that debris? Another possible alternative is that the perpetrators wanted to be sure they got credit for the attacks so an accomplice handed it to a policeman saying he'd found it in the street. There's two possibilities. What do you think?
 
I have no idea what the definitive truth is, and I don't auto believe any alternate theories without proper evidence either.

However, if anyone believes a passport of a terrorist was found legit in the wreckage, they'll believe literally anything they were told. That is so improbable it defies belief.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.