9/11 documentary now

You answer me a question or two West didsbury.
How does a passport belonging to one of the hijackers survive a fire that's apparently hot enough to melt steel?
Even if you want to say that on impact, lots of items got blown out of the windows and fell to the ground, did it jump out of his pocket first or unzip his hand luggage ?
I've not checked what name was on it but I hope it didn't say, Muhammed Atta - nationally -Saudi Arabia. That would be too comical for one of the world's most wanted men to carry around his genuine id.
Thinking about it, maybe he had it in his hand because he knew he was about to land and check in.

You're talking like his was the only passport that survived. There were passports, tickets, luggage tags, allsorts.
Il be the first to say that we arent getting the whole story about 9/11 but its stuff like this that just gets in the way of the truth
 
FBI agent Dan Coleman says he "was given the passport by Marty Mann, an NYPD detective. Someone handed it to Marty in the street and ran off.
We looked at the name and rang headquarters and found that the holder was one of the suspected terrorists"
What Mr Coleman fails to explain was how they did this while the telephone exchange in question was on fire and out of order.
 
FBI agent Dan Coleman says he "was given the passport by Marty Mann, an NYPD detective. Someone handed it to Marty in the street and ran off.
We looked at the name and rang headquarters and found that the holder was one of the suspected terrorists"
What Mr Coleman fails to explain was how they did this while the telephone exchange in question was on fire and out of order.
Come on then. What's your theory?
 
I am most bothered about the billions of dollars that were announced as being missing on the 10th Sepember, the records were kept in building 7 that collapsed without a plane hitting them and the offices in the pentagon that were investigating the lost money were the ones hit by the missile, sorry plane in the attack on the 11th. Very little mention of the money since.

Stories about the families of the owners of the towers not coming into work that day, the mayor of New York should have been in building 7 and was not there either along with some family members.

Was the Mayor meant to be there just that day?
Or did he work out of WTC7 every Tuesday?
Was this the first Tuesday he hadn't been there in ages?
What was his work pattern in say the month immediately prior to the attacks?
As Mayor of NYC, was his work pattern/schedule subject to regular change and last minute cancellations?
 
Come on then. What's your theory?

West Didsbury - you seem very certain in your opinion and very dismissive of those with a different opinion. You don't know for certain it was not a conspiracy just as those suggesting it may be don't know for certain that it was either.
 
You're talking like his was the only passport that survived. There were passports, tickets, luggage tags, allsorts.
Il be the first to say that we arent getting the whole story about 9/11 but its stuff like this that just gets in the way of the truth

People evacuating the North Tower spoke of luggage and even an airline seat in the fountain area that day.

Same goes for the bullshit spouted about a missile hitting the Pentagon.

Completely ignoring the aircraft being seen by hundreds of people in traffic jams on the freeway that morning.
 
There's no point in stating what my theory is West Didsbury. Everyone has their own opinion. Everyone has seen footage or documentaries to a greater or lesser extent. From people who just watched the events unfolding live on the news right up to the people who insist that one of the smoke clouds had the face of Osama bin laden!!!
As I've said before, I always thought that the conspiracy theory was too horrific a thought to comprehend.
When one unlikely or implausible action follows another though, it becomes questionable.
When the authorities find these smoking guns against all odds, it's bound to arouse suspicion. Maybe they shouldn't try so hard in future. They either find perfectly intact id or manuals on how to make bombs at the scene of an attack. You can either think, "that's handy, good work" or you can (after it happening with alarming regularity) think, "how convenient".
There's some high profile people in the USA that are openly accusing the government and it's agencies of mass murder. Why aren't they being hauled into court?
 
West Didsbury - you seem very certain in your opinion and very dismissive of those with a different opinion. You don't know for certain it was not a conspiracy just as those suggesting it may be don't know for certain that it was either.
I don't know anything for certain however having read quite a lot about it and about many conspiracies, there isn't a single conspiracy that is more plausible than what the investigation found. That doesn't mean every tiny detail can be explained fully but just because a complete explanation isn't available for everything doesn't mean there's got to be a conspiracy. Most conspiracy theory proponents focus on the improbabilities of certain facts that they use to justify their version but they won't provide a feasible alternative explanation. For example just saying it was a controlled demolition in no way explains how such a huge undertaking was done without anyone noticing. Also saying it was done to provide a motive for going to war defies previous history where the yanks have often intervened abroad militarily with little to no justification. That's why I think it's all bullshit.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.