9/11 documentary now

[west didsblue]

You can't see very well, can you?

Well come on then. Answer the question.
Was Danny Jowenko right about WTC7 but wrong about the twin towers in your opinion?

 

[west didsblue]

Lol, keep guessing. You think I didn't know Danny Jowenko said the twin towers weren't brought down by controlled demolition? He said that in the same interview I posted earlier. The towers weren't conventional demolitions. They were top down, which are rare in the demolition industry. Building 7 was a classic demolition job - bottom up - the type of demolition that Danny Jowenko was qualified to give his professional opinion on.

I rebutted your misinformed claim that "No-one with any real credibility has said anything that would suggest a controlled demolition." How about you explain how one of the leading experts in controlled demolition got is so completely wrong about Building 7?

So what you appear to be saying is that the twin towers were rigged up for a top down demolition that Danny Jowenko wasn't an expert in. Is it just coincidence that the demolition start point was where the aircraft hit on each building and all the burning aviation fuel didn't trigger the detonators early, set off the explosives early or burn through the detonation cord. It was an even more complicated job than I thought.
Either that, you're totally deluded or you're a WUM.

 

[Jim Tolmie's Underpants]

Well come on then. Answer the question.
Was Danny Jowenko right about WTC7 but wrong about the twin towers in your opinion?

I've already answered that question. Do me the courtesy of answering mine.

 

[west didsblue]

I've already answered that question. Do me the courtesy of answering mine.

Which one?

 

[Jim Tolmie's Underpants]

So what you appear to be saying is that the twin towers were rigged up for a top down demolition that Danny Jowenko wasn't an expert in. Is it just coincidence that the demolition start point was where the aircraft hit on each building and all the burning aviation fuel didn't trigger the detonators early, set off the explosives early or burn through the detonation cord. It was an even more complicated job than I thought.
Either that, you're totally deluded or you're a WUM.

I'm not going to bother with you any more if you're going to resort to insults. Either debate this with me like an adult or not at all. Choice is yours.

 

[west didsblue]

I'm not going to bother with you any more if you're going to resort to insults. Either debate this with me like an adult or not at all. Choice is yours.

Where did I insult you?

 

[Jim Tolmie's Underpants]

Where did I insult you?

*SIGH* This is starting to become rather tedius.

 

[Manchester_lalala]

So what you appear to be saying is that the twin towers were rigged up for a top down demolition that Danny Jowenko wasn't an expert in. Is it just coincidence that the demolition start point was where the aircraft hit on each building and all the burning aviation fuel didn't trigger the detonators early, set off the explosives early or burn through the detonation cord. It was an even more complicated job than I thought.
Either that, you're totally deluded or you're a WUM.

I think it's best if we just accept that we're not going to agree on the final outcome. To me, it's clear as day that it wasn't a controlled demolition. Some people will watch them videos Jim posted and agree with the controlled demolition theory. I just don't buy it at all, to many unsure opinions or twisted words.

 

[west didsblue]

*SIGH* This is starting to become rather tedius.

Fine. You come on here, spout bullshit, don't answer questions, then take the moral high ground. You've ignored all the clear incontrovertible evidence about what really happened and posted numerous videos that are all either rubbish or explainable. You're now saying that your demolition expert is only an expert in one type of demolition. Sorry, you're full of shit. And you can't spell tedious. Good night.

 

[Jim Tolmie's Underpants]

Fine. You come on here, spout bullshit, don't answer questions, then take the moral high ground. You've ignored all the clear incontrovertible evidence about what really happened and posted numerous videos that are all either rubbish or explainable. You're now saying that your demolition expert is only an expert in one type of demolition. Sorry, you're full of shit. And you can't spell tedious. Good night.

Since you are clearly incapable of debating like an adult and prefer to hurl insults and spit your dummy out, I won't be responding to any more of your posts.