9/11 documentary now

I'm guessing @Jim Tolmie's Underpants is trying to work out how he can say the twin towers was a controlled demolition without discrediting the only credible expert he could come up with. Either that or he'll change the subject or we won't see him for a while.
 
And they say the official story has too many holes in it!

The people claiming an inside job rely on a handful of experts knowledge and witnesses stating there was loud bangs at the scene of the towers. Not one person has came out admitting the truth, how many people would it take to organise something like this?

The more I think about it, the more I question why I even debate an inside job.
 
Of course not. You've put up a video of a single expert saying it visually looked like one whereas the experts who conducted the actual investigation said the opposite. I'll go with the majority who actually know all the details.

So you believe that - for the first time in human history - office fires brought down a steel structured building? You believe this building fell at free-fall speed straight down into the path of most resitence? You believe the symmetrical collapse due to asymmetrical damage isn't at odds with the principles of structural mechanics? You believe "“No blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses," despite this:



And this:



And this:



Well, you carry on blindly believing the word of these so-called "experts", then. I'll continue to think for myself.
 
I'm guessing @Jim Tolmie's Underpants is trying to work out how he can say the twin towers was a controlled demolition without discrediting the only credible expert he could come up with. Either that or he'll change the subject or we won't see him for a while.

Lol, keep guessing. You think I didn't know Danny Jowenko said the twin towers weren't brought down by controlled demolition? He said that in the same interview I posted earlier. The towers weren't conventional demolitions. They were top down, which are rare in the demolition industry. Building 7 was a classic demolition job - bottom up - the type of demolition that Danny Jowenko was qualified to give his professional opinion on.

I rebutted your misinformed claim that "No-one with any real credibility has said anything that would suggest a controlled demolition." How about you explain how one of the leading experts in controlled demolition got is so completely wrong about Building 7?
 
So you believe that - for the first time in human history - office fires brought down a steel structured building? You believe this building fell at free-fall speed straight down into the path of most resitence? You believe the symmetrical collapse due to asymmetrical damage isn't at odds with the principles of structural mechanics? You believe "“No blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses," despite this:



And this:



And this:



Well, you carry on blindly believing the word of these so-called "experts", then. I'll continue to think for myself.

I see you're going for the change the subject and not answer the question about the twin towers option.
 
More holes than Swiss cheese, mate. Here's a thing: Why did people know they were going to blow up the building?



I'm starting to think that your on a wind up. Them videos twist words and make out the people features in them know it's an inside job, or something along them lines. Just like that Larry Silverstein comment about pulling wtc 7, the conspiracy theory crackpots love that one.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.