Come on, mate, let's not go there! There's nothing I can say that's not already in this thread a million times. All I'll say is that I watched three debunk videos and none of them convinced me it definitely wasn't an inside job. That's not me saying it was, but that there are many things unanswered.What's suspicious about the Pentagon attack?
Ok I won't go there other than to say there were dozens of witnesses who saw an aircraft crash into it.Come on, mate, let's not go there! There's nothing I can say that's not already in this thread a million times. All I'll say is that I watched three debunk videos and none of them convinced me it definitely wasn't an inside job. That's not me saying it was, but that there are many things unanswered.
You really don't see the irony of your last point, do you? As far as I can see, in this thread it is the ones who don't believe it was an inside job that are prepared to listen to all sides and evidence whilst the truthers just keep repeating the same rhetoric despite the evidence against them.
Btw, I have always thought it was an inside job to one degree or another, until I saw the WTC 7 debunk video where the damage to the building is so vast and visible from the south side that you can clearly see why it would collapse. Not to mention the fact that the inside of the building was practically an empty shell.
Your point 6 about the media reporting it before it came down is now the only thing that concerns me with WTC 7. And the Pentagon attack is suspicious and no debunking videos I've seen can change my mind on that one.We're going round in circles here. It's not hard to digest that wtc 7 was hit by falling debris from the north tower, which resulted in structural damage and fires. Theres a picture of the south side of the wtc 7 totally fucked with smoke coming out of it. It's on that video you posted, that itself tells its own story.
4. We've got Silverstein himself on record giving instructions to "pull it". Demolition slang to bring it down.
Fuck sake, not this again.
Always wondered how flimsy wing tips can cut massive steel girders in half!
Always wondered how flimsy wing tips can cut massive steel girders in half!
Well that's what happened right there.
In my opinion there is no way fragile aeroplane wings should rip apart huge steel girders like it did. But what the fuck do I know!
Well Mass x Velocity didn't do that plane any favours!Mass x Velocity = Force. It's the same reason why a ping pong ball can go all the way through a table tennis bat if fired hard enough. And why water can cut through steel. Also, the wings weren't fragile, they were full of fuel.
All that video proves is why so little of the plane was found at the Pentagon.
When fully loaded that plane in the video weighs 27,000kg vs. 179,000kg for a fully loaded 767. It clearly had no fuel in it, so you can reduce that weight even further. It won't have been travelling at anywhere near 500mph, and it smashed into a 10ft thick reinforced concrete block. It really has no relevance whatsoever to the discussion.Well Mass x Velocity didn't do that plane any favours!
The wing tips of a plane are very thin/fragile but cut though steel not at supersonic speed but max 400mph no problem!