Skashion
Well-Known Member
Is that stupidity in incredulity, as in lack of incredulity?MCFCinUSA said:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
9/11 - More evidence it was set up by people in the shadows
- Thread starter HelloCity
- Start date
BulgarianPride
Well-Known Member
MCFCinUSA said:it never ceases to amaze me how incredulously stupid some people can be.
scary.
How is that every time someone puts an unorthodox view ,you immediately start branding them as stupid?
I am not saying that any of this is true, but it is an interesting view point. They are providing you with "evidence" , and analyzing it from their perspective.
What bugs my head is the blast at pentagon. The 1 frame/sec camera seems to speed during and after the explosion ( more frames per second). You see a gradual expansion of the flames and smoke. This all depends on the structural support of the pentagon but i would assume in 1sec the explosion would be near maximum amplitude. So if i am correct, we shouldn't see as a gradual expansion of the flames and smoke. It should look more laggy.
Another point on this is:
If in 1 second the plane is just appearing in the frame moving at 500mph( 223.52 m/s) then a second later it is at 223.52 meters a way. The distance between the plane's nose and the Pentagon does not look like 223.52 meters to me. Any less (<223.52, to me it looks like 25-50 meters max), and that flash of the initial explosion shouldn't have been recorded by the camera. The thing takes a picture every second.It's impossible to record such a smooth explosion by a slow camera like that.
By the way, i heard the camera was 1 frame/second from a documentary about the crash and not a conspiracy theory. The above is my simple analysis. It is not fact ( if the plane was moving at 500mph, then the numbers are fact)
Some very interesting simulations.
Edit: posted wrong video, here is the right one
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8&feature=related[/youtube]
There is more to 9/11 then people choose or are told to believe, if you watch the videos on you tube and read the stories the real stories not the ones from the Government newspapers you see some interesting facts. The one that got me is the pentagon the plane goes into to ye and if you look ion some pictures you see a WOODEN table with a BOOK on it, paper and wood burn easy and the two 6 tonne plane engines melt cause of the heat there steel still melts at around 900 degrees? so how did somet that hot not burn a table and a book ? there's little things like that that make you question it.
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Whoever made that video needs to take a good, long look at themselves. This is what happened on 9/11 - 2 planes crashed into the twin towers, its that simple really. Is this guy really suggesting the planes didn't exist?!!!
Pigeonho said:Whoever made that video needs to take a good, long look at themselves. This is what happened on 9/11 - 2 planes crashed into the twin towers, its that simple really. Is this guy really suggesting the planes didn't exist?!!!
This. IF the guy is the he's either really stupid, pathetic or just ignorant.
jay_mcfc
Well-Known Member
skillman said:Pigeonho said:Whoever made that video needs to take a good, long look at themselves. This is what happened on 9/11 - 2 planes crashed into the twin towers, its that simple really. Is this guy really suggesting the planes didn't exist?!!!
This. IF the guy is the he's either really stupid, pathetic or just ignorant.
Or doesn't believe anything the bent Governments of America and Britain tell him? Well done I say, there's far too much smelly stuff around 9/11 to just ignore it.
BulgarianPride said:MCFCinUSA said:it never ceases to amaze me how incredulously stupid some people can be.
scary.
How is that every time someone puts an unorthodox view ,you immediately start branding them as stupid?
I am not saying that any of this is true, but it is an interesting view point. They are providing you with "evidence" , and analyzing it from their perspective.
What bugs my head is the blast at pentagon. The 1 frame/sec camera seems to speed during and after the explosion ( more frames per second). You see a gradual expansion of the flames and smoke. This all depends on the structural support of the pentagon but i would assume in 1sec the explosion would be near maximum amplitude. So if i am correct, we shouldn't see as a gradual expansion of the flames and smoke. It should look more laggy.
Another point on this is:
If in 1 second the plane is just appearing in the frame moving at 500mph( 223.52 m/s) then a second later it is at 223.52 meters a way. The distance between the plane's nose and the Pentagon does not look like 223.52 meters to me. Any less (<223.52, to me it looks like 25-50 meters max), and that flash of the initial explosion shouldn't have been recorded by the camera. The thing takes a picture every second.It's impossible to record such a smooth explosion by a slow camera like that.
By the way, i heard the camera was 1 frame/second from a documentary about the crash and not a conspiracy theory. The above is my simple analysis. It is not fact ( if the plane was moving at 500mph, then the numbers are fact)
Some very interesting simulations.
<span>[youtube]<a class="smarterwiki-linkify" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paWiZ2Y8fRg&feature=related[/youtube]">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paWiZ2Y8fRg&feature=related[/youtube]</a></span>
<span>[youtube]<a class="smarterwiki-linkify" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8&feature=related[/youtube]">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8&feature=related[/youtube]</a></span>
1st plane:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpONEX8tme8&feature=related[/youtube]
2nd plane (this one is unbelievable):
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU&feature=related[/youtube]
Now, tell me that Pentagon video is right now. How people can even begin to deny that any planes were involved with 9/11 is beyond me!
I guess to them people, the towers just collapsed by themselves and it was a stone that caused a massive explosion?
I know it's harsh but I'm being respectful; Americans need to just leave trying to make stupid things up and create conspiracies and just respect the people who died!
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
I remember that second one when that shot came on the news. Its the 'best' shot there is and just makes it all the more horrifying. How the guy who made the video at the start of the thread can claim that plane is not real is something I really can't even begin to understand.skillman said:BulgarianPride said:How is that every time someone puts an unorthodox view ,you immediately start branding them as stupid?
I am not saying that any of this is true, but it is an interesting view point. They are providing you with "evidence" , and analyzing it from their perspective.
What bugs my head is the blast at pentagon. The 1 frame/sec camera seems to speed during and after the explosion ( more frames per second). You see a gradual expansion of the flames and smoke. This all depends on the structural support of the pentagon but i would assume in 1sec the explosion would be near maximum amplitude. So if i am correct, we shouldn't see as a gradual expansion of the flames and smoke. It should look more laggy.
Another point on this is:
If in 1 second the plane is just appearing in the frame moving at 500mph( 223.52 m/s) then a second later it is at 223.52 meters a way. The distance between the plane's nose and the Pentagon does not look like 223.52 meters to me. Any less (<223.52, to me it looks like 25-50 meters max), and that flash of the initial explosion shouldn't have been recorded by the camera. The thing takes a picture every second.It's impossible to record such a smooth explosion by a slow camera like that.
By the way, i heard the camera was 1 frame/second from a documentary about the crash and not a conspiracy theory. The above is my simple analysis. It is not fact ( if the plane was moving at 500mph, then the numbers are fact)
Some very interesting simulations.
<span>[youtube]<a class="smarterwiki-linkify" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paWiZ2Y8fRg&feature=related[/youtube]">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paWiZ2Y8fRg&feature=related[/youtube]</a></span>
<span>[youtube]<a class="smarterwiki-linkify" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8&feature=related[/youtube]">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cddIgb1nGJ8&feature=related[/youtube]</a></span>
1st plane:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpONEX8tme8&feature=related[/youtube]
2nd plane (this one is unbelievable):
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XELamUnF0EU&feature=related[/youtube]
Now, tell me that Pentagon video is right now. How people can even begin to deny that any planes were involved with 9/11 is beyond me!
I guess to them people, the towers just collapsed by themselves and it was a stone that caused a massive explosion?
I know it's harsh but I'm being respectful; Americans need to just leave trying to make stupid things up and create conspiracies and just respect the people who died!
bluemoonmatt
Well-Known Member
Only because there are so many idiotic nutjob consipracy theorist's about. I find talk of 9/11 being anything other than a tragic terrible act of heinous terrorism distasteful and disrespectful.jay_mcfc said:there's far too much smelly stuff around 9/11 to just ignore it.
Matty
Well-Known Member
Some people are so messed up in the head that they simply have to find conspiracy in everything.