9/11 - More evidence it was set up by people in the shadows

The post you've all been waiting for. The post which will decide the verdict of this topic.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow[/youtube]
 
ManCityX said:
The post you've all been waiting for. The post which will decide the verdict of this topic.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXD3bAbZCow[/youtube]

Well, that's me convinced.
 
buzzer1 said:
spanish blue said:
buzzer, not about 9/11 but what is your take on flouride in our water.

Yes i believe that we are being dumbed down with Flouride in our water. What do you reckon?

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:38 pm --

ElanJo said:
You just said, a page or 2 ago, that you don't have any evidence...

Apparently nobody has Physical evidence, but you also said that you can only go off the evidence provided and draw your own conclusions? I agreed.

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:42 pm --

Cheesy said:
What evidence is that?

Evidence that i have absorbed from various people and then have drawn my own conclusions from, probably about as much as everybody on this thread, it's just the source that is in question.

Evidence that i have absorbed from various people

Christ, he's a Borg now!
 
buzzer1 said:
spanish blue said:
buzzer, not about 9/11 but what is your take on flouride in our water.

Yes i believe that we are being dumbed down with Flouride in our water. What do you reckon?

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:38 pm --

ElanJo said:
You just said, a page or 2 ago, that you don't have any evidence...

Apparently nobody has Physical evidence, but you also said that you can only go off the evidence provided and draw your own conclusions? I agreed.

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:42 pm --

Cheesy said:
What evidence is that?

Evidence that i have absorbed from various people and then have drawn my own conclusions from, probably about as much as everybody on this thread, it's just the source that is in question.


Buzzer, do you have any idea of how much it would cost to put a man on the moon for a significant amount of time? Do you have an idea of what is even required for him to be able to stay up there safely?

Have a look at this article.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/moonmars/features/magnetotail_080416.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nasa.gov/topics/moonmars/fea ... 80416.html</a>

it would give you a hint of how many problems need to be over come before anyone can put a man on the moon for a significant amount of time.

From the above article.
You need to read it all to understand why this happens.

On the moon’s dayside this effect is counteracted to a degree by sunlight: UV photons knock electrons back off the surface, keeping the build-up of charge at relatively low levels. But on the nightside, in the cold lunar dark, electrons accumulate and surface voltages can climb to hundreds or thousands of volts
Imagine what it feels like to be a sock pulled crackling from a dryer. Astronauts on the moon during a magnetotail crossing might be able to tell you. Walking across the dusty charged-up lunar terrain, the astronauts themselves would gather a load of excess charge. Touching another astronaut, a doorknob, a piece of sensitive electronics -- any of these simple actions could produce an unwelcome discharge. Proper grounding is strongly recommended,” says Stubbs.

Much of this is pure speculation, Stubbs cautions. No one can say for sure what happens on the moon when the magnetotail hits, because no one has been there at the crucial time. “Apollo astronauts never landed on a full moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.”

I should mention, when the moon is out of the magnetotail, it has not protecting from the dangerous sun bursts that could happen anytime. Seeing as how its only in the magnetotail for about 6-8 days, the rest of the time it's unprotected from the sun flairs. A sun flair will destroy all the electronics and possibly kill everyone.

Not to mention the temperatures on the moon. Max temperature is 123 degrees Celsius, min temperature is -233 degrees. The astronauts need a lot of protection from the heat and the cold.
 
ElanJo said:
ElanJo said:
Apparently nobody has Physical evidence, but you also said that you can only go off the evidence provided and draw your own conclusions? I agreed.

I give up, MCFCintheUSA was right, it's like dealing with children.

Oh the irony, a quote from the biggest child on the forum and your........ agreeing with him, oh the irony.

-- Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:23 pm --

denislawsbackheel said:
buzzer1 said:
Yes i believe that we are being dumbed down with Flouride in our water. What do you reckon?

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:38 pm --



Apparently nobody has Physical evidence, but you also said that you can only go off the evidence provided and draw your own conclusions? I agreed.

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:42 pm --



Evidence that i have absorbed from various people and then have drawn my own conclusions from, probably about as much as everybody on this thread, it's just the source that is in question.

Evidence that i have absorbed from various people

Christ, he's a Borg now!

And here's me thinking that he was Crucified years ago.<br /><br />-- Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:39 pm --<br /><br />
BulgarianPride said:
buzzer1 said:
Yes i believe that we are being dumbed down with Flouride in our water. What do you reckon?

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:38 pm --



Apparently nobody has Physical evidence, but you also said that you can only go off the evidence provided and draw your own conclusions? I agreed.

-- Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:42 pm --



Evidence that i have absorbed from various people and then have drawn my own conclusions from, probably about as much as everybody on this thread, it's just the source that is in question.


Buzzer, do you have any idea of how much it would cost to put a man on the moon for a significant amount of time? Do you have an idea of what is even required for him to be able to stay up there safely?

Have a look at this article.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/moonmars/features/magnetotail_080416.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nasa.gov/topics/moonmars/fea ... 80416.html</a>

it would give you a hint of how many problems need to be over come before anyone can put a man on the moon for a significant amount of time.

From the above article.
You need to read it all to understand why this happens.

On the moon’s dayside this effect is counteracted to a degree by sunlight: UV photons knock electrons back off the surface, keeping the build-up of charge at relatively low levels. But on the nightside, in the cold lunar dark, electrons accumulate and surface voltages can climb to hundreds or thousands of volts
Imagine what it feels like to be a sock pulled crackling from a dryer. Astronauts on the moon during a magnetotail crossing might be able to tell you. Walking across the dusty charged-up lunar terrain, the astronauts themselves would gather a load of excess charge. Touching another astronaut, a doorknob, a piece of sensitive electronics -- any of these simple actions could produce an unwelcome discharge. Proper grounding is strongly recommended,” says Stubbs.

Much of this is pure speculation, Stubbs cautions. No one can say for sure what happens on the moon when the magnetotail hits, because no one has been there at the crucial time. “Apollo astronauts never landed on a full moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.”

I should mention, when the moon is out of the magnetotail, it has not protecting from the dangerous sun bursts that could happen anytime. Seeing as how its only in the magnetotail for about 6-8 days, the rest of the time it's unprotected from the sun flairs. A sun flair will destroy all the electronics and possibly kill everyone.

Not to mention the temperatures on the moon. Max temperature is 123 degrees Celsius, min temperature is -233 degrees. The astronauts need a lot of protection from the heat and the cold.

To all on this thread, for the last time. Nobody, possibly in our lifetime will know the full truth of what exactly goes on within the corridors of power, be it the UFO debate, the life on other planets scenario and just about most topics surrounding Conspiracies(cue the because there is nothing to say its all bullshit comments).
Elanjo, you can throw as many 'childish' comments as you like,but not even with your superhuman mind can you know the full story, and that goes for all the debunkers and the muppets that have nothing to add to the thread but a sly dig and leaching upto one of the many Scientists that frequent threads like this one.
The End.
 
This is all getting a little too personal for my liking. Please keep it on topic or we'll have to remove the thread.

I personally don't know about 9/11 as a conspiracy of what happened, as I cannot seem to separate the fact from fiction in the evidence.

However, I absolutely, resolutely believe that the perpetrators had next to no connection with Osama Bin Laden, and that Bin Laden had nothing at all to do with 9/11.

I have yet to see a single piece of unforged evidence that links him with this. In reality, the Spanish group ETA had far more links to 9/11 than Bin Laden ever did (though obviously, I'm not saying they did it). The logic used to associate Bin Laden with 9/11 was absolutely baffling. I also have no idea why the US Government released evidence which was later proven to be forged.
 
My view on the whole thing is that certain parts of what happened do look dodgy i.e. controlled explosions, no plane actually hitting the tower? Also, the US government stood to gain alot by invading the middle east (oil!).

However, imagine how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy this size, government, planning, demolitions experts etc...as if ONE of those people wouldn't have come forward by now and let it out!
 
My feeling is that there has been no conspiracy except for covering up the complete fuck ups in intelligence. I suspect that had the agencies in question done their respecive jobs properly then the event could have been prevented.
 
Bojinov The Bull said:
My view on the whole thing is that certain parts of what happened do look dodgy i.e. controlled explosions, no plane actually hitting the tower? Also, the US government stood to gain alot by invading the middle east (oil!).

However, imagine how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy this size, government, planning, demolitions experts etc...as if ONE of those people wouldn't have come forward by now and let it out!

Well, let's look at what you would REALLY need. A few people who plan it, perhaps three to bounce ideas off of each other. One agent to set the explosives and explode it, one agent to find and fund the terrorists (which is done ALL THE TIME without leaks), one guy to setup the FAA responses and Army responses.

So far, I have 5, and those jobs could be crossed together so that the same person could do more than one.

How many Al-Qaeda people do you believe were involved in this?


I don't specifically believe it was a conspiracy by the US. I personally believe that it was a fanatical group of Muslims, based in Germany, funded by the Saudis (through sources found in Egypt and Spain, and banks in the US and UAE) who had no real connection to anyone else.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.