9/11 - More evidence it was set up by people in the shadows

Maintainin said:
Back to Virginia: Langley Air Force Base is around 130 miles from the nations capital so why did NORAD say it scrambled jets from that far away when Andrews Air Force Base the very one designated to defend the nations capital is only a little over ten miles away over the water from DC and pilots from AAFB could have had breakfast and still intercepted Flight 77 with time to spare.

bullshit. langley is situated in an overspill area of washington dc just over the virginia border. the driving distance between langley & washington is 9 miles. the flying distance is 7 miles.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/driving-distance/from/Washington,+DC/to/Langley,+VA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/driving-dista ... angley,+VA</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distance/from/Langley,+VA/to/Washington,+DC" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distan ... ington,+DC</a>
 
rassclot said:
Maintainin said:
Back to Virginia: Langley Air Force Base is around 130 miles from the nations capital so why did NORAD say it scrambled jets from that far away when Andrews Air Force Base the very one designated to defend the nations capital is only a little over ten miles away over the water from DC and pilots from AAFB could have had breakfast and still intercepted Flight 77 with time to spare.

bullshit. langley is situated in an overspill area of washington dc just over the virginia border. the driving distance between langley & washington is 9 miles. the flying distance is 7 miles.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/driving-distance/from/Washington,+DC/to/Langley,+VA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/driving-dista ... angley,+VA</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distance/from/Langley,+VA/to/Washington,+DC" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distan ... ington,+DC</a>
Haha i'm losing the plot rass, i stand well corrected, fuck knows how i concluded that when it's only over the friggin water.

I'll re-collect my trail of thought and edit appropriatly ! (my bad)
 
rassclot said:
Maintainin said:
Back to Virginia: Langley Air Force Base is around 130 miles from the nations capital so why did NORAD say it scrambled jets from that far away when Andrews Air Force Base the very one designated to defend the nations capital is only a little over ten miles away over the water from DC and pilots from AAFB could have had breakfast and still intercepted Flight 77 with time to spare.

bullshit. langley is situated in an overspill area of washington dc just over the virginia border. the driving distance between langley & washington is 9 miles. the flying distance is 7 miles.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/driving-distance/from/Washington,+DC/to/Langley,+VA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/driving-dista ... angley,+VA</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distance/from/Langley,+VA/to/Washington,+DC" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distan ... ington,+DC</a>

Bullshit.
Everyone knows that Langley is in Middleton.
Not sure that an airstrike there could make things any worse,although it may take out the Ward family.
Perhaps they are behind 9/11.
Its as plausible an explanation than any of the crackpot theories on offer on this thread.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
rassclot said:
Maintainin said:
Back to Virginia: Langley Air Force Base is around 130 miles from the nations capital so why did NORAD say it scrambled jets from that far away when Andrews Air Force Base the very one designated to defend the nations capital is only a little over ten miles away over the water from DC and pilots from AAFB could have had breakfast and still intercepted Flight 77 with time to spare.

bullshit. langley is situated in an overspill area of washington dc just over the virginia border. the driving distance between langley & washington is 9 miles. the flying distance is 7 miles.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/driving-distance/from/Washington,+DC/to/Langley,+VA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/driving-dista ... angley,+VA</a>

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distance/from/Langley,+VA/to/Washington,+DC" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.travelmath.com/flight-distan ... ington,+DC</a>

Bullshit.
Everyone knows that Langley is in Middleton.
Not sure that an airstrike there could make things any worse,although it may take out the Ward family.
Perhaps they are behind 9/11.
Its as plausible an explanation than any of the crackpot theories on offer on this thread.
I hereby withdraw my ramblins from the Mooners commission findins and thus await for this case to be taken up by the rite honorable 1st Earl of Langley Sir Donald of Farrington...
 
MCFCinUSA said:
ctid-1990 said:
dont know if this has been posted already as i cant be arsed looking through 40 odd pages of this thread but there is a realy interesting video on you tube called loose change looking into the reasons behind why 9/11 was an inside job. Not sayin i deffinatley believe it but the points they put across do lead you to think there is a possibility it was an inside job by the US government and the reasons why it could have been beneficial to them.

43730037.jpg


Have you seen this film?

Do you believe in Santa Claus too?

(and you obviously didn't read the above post or this either: <a class="postlink-local" href="http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=139026" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=5&t=139026</a> )

Not to worry... Loose Change is another of the loony films CTID, but if you give it a little thought I'm sure you'll figure it out in the end.

No i dont believe in Santa Claus but if you had taken the time to read my post i said i dont deffinatley believe in the things said in loose change! i was simply saying it was out there to people interested if that is ok with you?
 
Halfpenny said:
If the 9/11 victim phone hacking story is legit, it's going to really hit the fan for Murdoch. He'd almost certainly face a congressional enquiry, an absolutely monumental backlash from the American public and ratings for Fox News would go through the floor. Staggering to think that such an expansive media empire can seemingly crumble in such a short time.

No way they could directly link him without the evidence, just because he owns the newspaper doesnt mean he would know about the dealings going on inside and if he did they would still need substantial evidence to convict him of a crime, unless they just shove him in Guantanimo (the place Obama said he would shut down)
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Halfpenny said:
If the 9/11 victim phone hacking story is legit, it's going to really hit the fan for Murdoch. He'd almost certainly face a congressional enquiry, an absolutely monumental backlash from the American public and ratings for Fox News would go through the floor. Staggering to think that such an expansive media empire can seemingly crumble in such a short time.

No way they could directly link him without the evidence, just because he owns the newspaper doesnt mean he would know about the dealings going on inside and if he did they would still need substantial evidence to convict him of a crime, unless they just shove him in Guantanimo (the place Obama said he would shut down)
Doesn't matter whether he knew or not. They can do him and any other executive.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Halfpenny said:
If the 9/11 victim phone hacking story is legit, it's going to really hit the fan for Murdoch. He'd almost certainly face a congressional enquiry, an absolutely monumental backlash from the American public and ratings for Fox News would go through the floor. Staggering to think that such an expansive media empire can seemingly crumble in such a short time.

No way they could directly link him without the evidence, just because he owns the newspaper doesnt mean he would know about the dealings going on inside and if he did they would still need substantial evidence to convict him of a crime, unless they just shove him in Guantanimo (the place Obama said he would shut down)
Doesn't matter whether he knew or not. They can do him and any other executive.

I wont argue with you on that colin but how does it work? I dont see how someone else breaking the law can get an executive in prison
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
No way they could directly link him without the evidence, just because he owns the newspaper doesnt mean he would know about the dealings going on inside and if he did they would still need substantial evidence to convict him of a crime, unless they just shove him in Guantanimo (the place Obama said he would shut down)
Doesn't matter whether he knew or not. They can do him and any other executive.
I wont argue with you on that colin but how does it work? I dont see how someone else breaking the law can get an executive in prison
It's called vicarious liability; the presumption that a superior is implicitly responsible for the acts of their subordinates.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.