MCFCinUSA said:
beatyswollocks said:
The pentagon, the worlds most watched building, with over 80 cctv cameras picking up the supposed "plane crash" (not my words, the FBI) why have they not been released, why after 10 years nearly, have they not been released, not one out of around 80 recordings that shows a clear and distinguished video of a plane crashing into the pentagon.
but there is video although it's not superb, and also computer simulations - both of which I've seen; the aircraft approaches very low over the ground and takes out some pole structures before hitting the building.
I may be right in thinking that I have seen this video, it is available on youtube, however IT DOES NOT show a clear image of a boeing airliner crashing into the pentagon, the quality is extremely poor. Are you seriously telling me that a poor quality, unidentifiable cctv recording of this supposed plane is the best piece of evidence? Is this the most reliable cctv recording that was available out of over 80 recordings?. I will not believe it until I see it.<br /><br />-- Tue Jul 12, 2011 7:07 pm --<br /><br />To simplify my rational for thinking there is more than meets the eye than initially thought, here are numerous, factual reasons for thinking the hijackers were fake.
1.) The hijackers names do not appear on any of the flight's manifests.
2.) None of the hijackers were subject to any autopsy.
3.) 5-7 of the supposed hijackers have turned up alive and well living in the Middle East. They have even been interviewed by the BBC and the Guardian in the U.K.
4.) The FBI nevertheless has not revised its list.
5.) A special agent of the FBI by the name of "Flagg", has explained that the FBI knew almost immediately the names of all 19 hijackers, because they discovered a piece of luggage left by Mohamed Atta when he had driven up to Portland, and then turned around and rushed down to Logan just in time to participate in a hijacking of a plane from that airport. According to "Flagg", this piece of luggage that Atta left behind, not only included a terrorist manual, but a very convenient list of the 19 hijackers, that's really quite amazing isn't it considering 5-7 of these hijackers have turned up alive and well.
6.) These hijackers could not have flown these planes. Pilots and aeronautical engineers have studied there training background. It is simply preposterous to presume these guys who could barely get a cessna off the ground could have piloted a commercial airliner and brought it to its target. It's preposterous.
7.) Those cell phone calls that we've heard so much about could not have been made at the altitudes and speeds these planes were flying. Professors of computer science have taken cell phones of different rates and models on different flights around the country and discovered at altitudes above 2000 feet and speeds above 230 mph that cellphone connections become fewer and farther between. They would have been impossible. Thta of course would include the well known call made by "Mark Bingham" where he calls his other and goes "mum this is Mark Bingham, you believe me don't you?".
8.) During the trial of the alleged 20th hijacker "Zacarias Moussaoui", a tape recording was played allegedly from Flight 93, which included the passengers discussing how they would attempt to break down the cabin door using a drink cart. A student in fact pointed out that this was a cockpit voice recording and that cockpit voice recorders do not record voices in the passenger compartment.
9.) The last words attributed on that tape to the hijackers, who were facing imminent death was "Allahu Akbar Allahu Akbar" which is Arabic for "god is great god is great". According to a Muslim member of scholars for 9/11 truth the last words that a devout follower of Islam should say when confronting imminent death is not those words, but rather, in Arabic "There is but one god "Allah" and "Mohammed" is his prophet.
10.) "Zacarias Moussaoui", in April 2006, was subjected to a trial to determine whether he was to be punished by life imprisonment or even death. For not coming forward to reveal the plot which the government maintained had he done, would have enabled the government to intervene and save lives. There is 3 observations i have made. Two years before April 06, "Zacarias Moussaoui" confessed to a different plot. He had knowledge that he had been involved in a plot to fly a plane into the White House in order to extort release of a terrorist Sheikh who had been in prison for terrorist activities in 1993. He denied he had anything to do with 9/11, that is the crime to which he confessed. A year later the Federal Government had played a shell game and insinuated and implied that he had something to with 9/11. As "Webster Tarpley" has observed, this man had no obligation to come forward and confess his involvement in a plot even if had been involved in 9/11. He had no obligation to incriminate himself. Finally, and most tellingly, and this must have been incredibly embarrassing to the Government, an FBI agent had testified he had been following "Moussaoui", he had been observing him taking this flight training, he had suspected he might be involved in a terrorist plot, even to fly planes into the trade towers. Though he suggested later, that it was "merely a lucky guess". He testified under oath, that he told his superiors about his suspicions, not once, not twice, 70 TIMES, I say to you, 5 or 6 might be excused as ordinary incompetence, 20 or 25 may be criminal neglect, 70 TIMES that is a matter of deliberate policy, they were keeping these guys in reserve so they could use them as a cover story when the Government itself perpetrated these dastardly terrorist acts.
