9/11

Donkey Boy said:
hilts said:
this is my point anyone reading this would say "it was the yanks the bastards" but i can guarantee that everyone of these points if you look hard enough could be discredited by someone somewhere or turned on their head, because people put things on the web doesnt make it true

at the end of the day you can only ask yourself three questions

would they do it, could they do it and would they get away with it

Yes they would, yes they could and yes they DID!

and there's the crutch i dont think they could. And DID makes it a fact and you dont know for a fact.
 
hilts said:
Donkey Boy said:
Yes they would, yes they could and yes they DID!

and there's the crutch i dont think they could. And DID makes it a fact and you dont know for a fact.

And actually neither do you but if you had the desire or intelligence to investigate the evidence with a modicum of awareness I am confident you would come to a similar conclusion

Unfortunately the majority choose not to do so QED<br /><br />-- Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:37 am --<br /><br />
Costa Del City said:
Donkey Boy said:
Err that's okay then DUH!

Get a grip.

On what?
 
People need to stop all this "it's a conspiracy"/"no it isn't" just for this one day! Whatever happened, whoever did it, thousands of people died unjustly because of terrorists and a government who failed them. RIP to all those who died, except for the perpetrators of this cowardly act, I hope they rot in hell.
 
professor_frink said:
People need to stop all this "it's a conspiracy"/"no it isn't" just for this one day! Whatever happened, whoever did it, thousands of people died unjustly because of terrorists and a government who failed them. RIP to all those who died, except for the perpetrators of this cowardly act, I hope they rot in hell.

because of terrorists and a government who failed them...well if I'd lost a loved one I guess I would want to know......wouldn't you?
 
Donkey Boy said:
hilts said:
and there's the crutch i dont think they could. And DID makes it a fact and you dont know for a fact.

And actually neither do you but if you had the desire or intelligence to investigate the evidence with a modicum of awareness I am confident you would come to a similar conclusion

Unfortunately the majority choose not to do so QED

-- Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:37 am --

Costa Del City said:
Get a grip.

On what?

for a start as you dont know me it is a little unfair to question my intelligence, with regards to desire i am old enough to realise that you can only research a subject objectively if you have complete faith in the source of the information.
 
hilts said:
Donkey Boy said:
And actually neither do you but if you had the desire or intelligence to investigate the evidence with a modicum of awareness I am confident you would come to a similar conclusion

Unfortunately the majority choose not to do so QED

-- Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:37 am --



On what?

for a start as you dont know me it is a little unfair to question my intelligence, with regards to desire i am old enough to realise that you can only research a subject objectively if you have complete faith in the source of the information.

subject objectively if you have complete faith in the source of the information.....your SOURCE let me guess D Telegraph BBC CNN SKY Murdoch LOL ;-)
 
Donkey Boy said:
hilts said:
for a start as you dont know me it is a little unfair to question my intelligence, with regards to desire i am old enough to realise that you can only research a subject objectively if you have complete faith in the source of the information.

subject objectively if you have complete faith in the source of the information.....your SOURCE let me guess D Telegraph BBC CNN SKY Murdoch LOL ;-)

your jumping to unfounded conclusions again fella it is you who have declared you know something for a fact not me, i try not to let inner bias stop me from forming an opnion, and sometimes you have to accept that certain things you will never know the answer to, i would also suggest that murdoch and its media outlets are pretty far apart from the bbc
 
hilts said:
Donkey Boy said:
subject objectively if you have complete faith in the source of the information.....your SOURCE let me guess D Telegraph BBC CNN SKY Murdoch LOL ;-)

your jumping to unfounded conclusions again fella it is you who have declared you know something for a fact not me, i try not to let inner bias stop me from forming an opnion, and sometimes you have to accept that certain things you will never know the answer to, i would also suggest that murdoch and its media outlets are pretty far apart from the bbc

Fair point and yet you assume I know, which I don't however I am not convinced re the official story, unlike yourself
 
Donkey Boy said:
hilts said:
your jumping to unfounded conclusions again fella it is you who have declared you know something for a fact not me, i try not to let inner bias stop me from forming an opnion, and sometimes you have to accept that certain things you will never know the answer to, i would also suggest that murdoch and its media outlets are pretty far apart from the bbc

Fair point and yet you assume I know, which I don't however I am not convinced re the official story, unlike yourself


for a start you said they DID so you did assume, secondly if you show me where i said i was convinced i will happily get you a cheap crate of german beer from lidl, otherwise you owe me a bottle of whiskey
 
As far as 9/11 is concerned i have spent 100's of hours over the years reading articles,watching documentaries and reading books on the subject. I have my opinion on it as im sure everyone has.The truth is, we will never ever know exactly what happened that day,yes two planes crashed into the twin towers but that is it.Everything else is open to question,whether you question it or not is up to you.
The biggest question i have is(and im still waiting for someone to give me a logical answer) how did the BBC report that WTC7 collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did.
 
fawada28 said:
I'm not saying that everything in Loose change is proven but it does make you ask questions about the initial report. Most of my friends here even know that there was something fishy going on that day and then on top of that Bush gets re elected in 04. All these movies, music, entertainment ets. is just to keep the mass population busy and not to look any further into the matter. JFK was the last true president btw. Look at what happens to the celebs that go against it (ie. Michael Jackson, 2pac, Kennedys, Diana)

If it doesn't make sense its usually not true.

"JFK was the last true president..."

Are you serious?

Is that the same JFK who, according to conspiracy theorists, was involved in the death of Marilyn Monroe?

The same JFK who had close links to organised crime?

The same JFK whose father was a gun-runer for the Nazis and the IRA?

The best thing that happened to JFK was getting assassinated and becoming a saint.. as had he survived another couple of years he would now have the reputation of a Richard Nixon!
 
imber50 said:
As far as 9/11 is concerned i have spent 100's of hours over the years reading articles,watching documentaries and reading books on the subject. I have my opinion on it as im sure everyone has.The truth is, we will never ever know exactly what happened that day,yes two planes crashed into the twin towers but that is it.Everything else is open to question,whether you question it or not is up to you.
The biggest question i have is(and im still waiting for someone to give me a logical answer) how did the BBC report that WTC7 collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did.

I not doubting you, but where does it say that they reported it 20 mins before it halpened?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top