9-11

Cheesy said:
Buildings just don't collapse like the Twin Towers did.

Or do they........................

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTAlgAWkqro[/youtube]

Is this support for or against fire causing full collapse of a modern steel building? It doesn't really look like the collapse of WTC7.
 
BulgarianPride said:
Banned Tosspot said:
BulgarianPride said:
Total civilians killed at perl harbor = 57.

Total people killed in Hiroshima = 90,000–166,000 with approximately 75-90% civilians. Which at minimal (75%) means 67500 to 120000 civilians killed. How many children and women do you think they were?
Every life counts whether it's a small amount or not.

More lives were saved by the war being ended.

I have not said i value one's life over an other. But if you are using the killing of 57 civilians as a justification of the nuclear bombings, it would mean you value an American's life approximately 1600 times more and a Japanese life.

Per Harbor = strategical strike, Atomic bombings in japan = Crime against humanity.
Some, if not most of the kids at Pearl Harbour were non American.
 
BulgarianPride said:
Cheesy said:
Buildings just don't collapse like the Twin Towers did.

Or do they........................

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTAlgAWkqro[/youtube]

Is this support for or against fire causing full collapse of a modern steel building? It doesn't really look like the collapse of WTC7.
I tried to watch it but couldn't see anything.
 
BulgarianPride said:
Banned Tosspot said:
BulgarianPride said:
Total civilians killed at perl harbor = 57.

Total people killed in Hiroshima = 90,000–166,000 with approximately 75-90% civilians. Which at minimal (75%) means 67500 to 120000 civilians killed. How many children and women do you think they were?
Every life counts whether it's a small amount or not.

More lives were saved by the war being ended.

I have not said i value one's life over an other. But if you are using the killing of 57 civilians as a justification of the nuclear bombings, it would mean you value an American's life approximately 1600 times more and a Japanese life.

Per Harbor = strategical strike, Atomic bombings in japan = Crime against humanity.

they had bad strategists then.
 
BulgarianPride said:
Banned Tosspot said:
BulgarianPride said:
Total civilians killed at perl harbor = 57.

Total people killed in Hiroshima = 90,000–166,000 with approximately 75-90% civilians. Which at minimal (75%) means 67500 to 120000 civilians killed. How many children and women do you think they were?
Every life counts whether it's a small amount or not.

More lives were saved by the war being ended.

I have not said i value one's life over an other. But if you are using the killing of 57 civilians as a justification of the nuclear bombings, it would mean you value an American's life approximately 1600 times more and a Japanese life.

Per Harbor = strategical strike, Atomic bombings in japan = Crime against humanity.
Rape of Nanking 300 thousand men women and children murdered hmmm the Japanese at this time were nice people.
 
Banned Tosspot said:
Some, if not most of the kids at Pearl Harbour were non American.
Some of them may have been American but Hawaii didn't become an American state until 1959. So if any of them were born there, they weren't American, no. I don't know why that should matter though. I really am disturbed at how few people seem to agree with me that all innocent life regardless of nationality, race, gender, what football team they support etc. is precious and should be saved wherever possible.
 
Skashion said:
BulgarianPride said:
Cheesy said:
Buildings just don't collapse like the Twin Towers did.

Or do they........................

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTAlgAWkqro[/youtube]

Is this support for or against fire causing full collapse of a modern steel building? It doesn't really look like the collapse of WTC7.
I tried to watch it but couldn't see anything.

40s to 42 secs is visible collapse of the top of the building.
 
Skashion said:
Banned Tosspot said:
Some, if not most of the kids at Pearl Harbour were non American.
Some of them may have been American but Hawaii didn't become an American state until 1959. So if any of them were born there, they weren't American, no. I don't know why that should matter though. I really am disturbed at how few people seem to agree with me that all innocent life regardless of nationality, race, gender, what football team they support etc. is precious and should be saved wherever possible.
I respect all life.

You were the one who originally mentioned that some were non American so that's why I'm discussing it.

You're clearly anti America.
 
i kne albert davy said:
BulgarianPride said:
Banned Tosspot said:
Every life counts whether it's a small amount or not.

More lives were saved by the war being ended.

I have not said i value one's life over an other. But if you are using the killing of 57 civilians as a justification of the nuclear bombings, it would mean you value an American's life approximately 1600 times more and a Japanese life.

Per Harbor = strategical strike, Atomic bombings in japan = Crime against humanity.
Rape of Nanking 300 thousand men women and children murdered hmmm the Japanese at this time were nice people.

So you are justifying murder by commuting more murder?
 
BulgarianPride said:
40s to 42 secs is visible collapse of the top of the building.
No, you dope, I mean, does it look like freefall to you? I haven't gotten out measuring software or anything but to the naked eye that looks hugely lower than freefall. Not even close.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.