9 | Erling Haaland - 2022/23 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you can show me where I said I disliked (your word) Haaland, I'd be grateful.
You value him as not the best footballer in the world - and by your sarcastic post - you imply that it's not close.

You said, "Behave. He's not even the best footballer at City." I've made it clear that I couldn't disagree more.
 
Great player, obviously, but also what a great bloke. Always got a smile on his face, every game properly applauds the fans after the final whistle and the last off the pitch (just mentioning as several thousand won’t see this every week)

That’s cause he’s a blue mate,all top lads and lasses…….well in the main :)
 
You value him as not the best footballer in the world - and by your sarcastic post - you imply that it's not close.

You said, "Behave. He's not even the best footballer at City." I've made it clear that I couldn't disagree more.
I'll ask you again; where did I say I disliked him? And I stand by my opinion, he's not the best footballer at City. Best striker? Undoubtedly. But not the best" footballer". And my post wasn't sarcastic, by the way. You need to be careful about making false accusations.
 
I'll ask you again; where did I say I disliked him? And I stand by my opinion, he's not the best footballer at City. Best striker? Undoubtedly. But not the best" footballer". And my post wasn't sarcastic, by the way. You need to be careful about making false accusations.
You're going round and round in circles.

IMO Haaland is the best footballer in world football - bar none.

You think otherwise.

It's subjective. And you continue to argue my opinion as if it's a matter of objective fact.

Yet you insist on winning this subjective argument - whatever. Look, you value other footballing traits and have a different perspective - OK. I get it. I however disagree, absolutely.
 
You're going round and round in circles.

IMO Haaland is the best footballer in world football - bar none.

You think otherwise.

It's subjective. And you continue to argue my opinion as if it's a matter of objective fact.

Yet you insist on winning this subjective argument - whatever. Look, you value other footballing traits and have a different perspective - OK. I get it. I however disagree, absolutely.
What do you class as a footballer? Someone who knows how to position themselves and has the ability to score lots and lots of goals or someone who is a master of the ball?

Haaland is the best striker in the world. Not the best footballer.
 
You're going round and round in circles.

IMO Haaland is the best footballer in world football - bar none.

You think otherwise.

It's subjective. And you continue to argue my opinion as if it's a matter of objective fact.

Yet you insist on winning this subjective argument - whatever. Look, you value other footballing traits and have a different perspective - OK. I get it. I however disagree, absolutely.
My last post on the matter (I promise); do you honestly think that Haaland is a better footballer than De Bruyne?
 
None of them paid off, but I felt like we were more proactive with finding Haaland. Gundogan and De Bruyne tried to slip him in a number of times.
 
What do you class as a footballer? Someone who knows how to position themselves and has the ability to score lots and lots of goals or someone who is a master of the ball?

Haaland is the best striker in the world. Not the best footballer.
If he were simply the best striker I'd agree.

But there comes a point - where said best striker scores so many goals that this singular ability swamps everything else - and Haaland is a freak goal scorer - and his scoring ability, swamps his technical short-comings, IMO.

I suppose it boils down to what you call "best" - for me, "best" means the player most likely to mean your side wins.

And for me - by that definition - Haaland is best.

If by best - you mean most technical - or best dribbler or whatever - then Haaland isn't close. He's average at best technically. But the guy scores goals at a far greater rate than anyone else in football - so much so that this swamps his technical short comings.
===
Here's my take on "best" footballer.

The best footballer most enhances his side of winning the game. Period.

This encompasses goals scored, goals assisted, team chemistry, to a much lesser extent defense and so on. It's all about winning as a team.

For me - Haaland is the best and I'd trade him for no other.

If you think - by this criterion - who most enhances a team's ability to win - then I'm interested in your opinion.
 
Haaland IS the best striker in the world and deserves the best song, for that mantle, a more creative song - Haaland Haaland? ffs, what is that? We can do better than that!...Can we get the 80’s 90’s crews on it, the old men from then, so to speak...the kids in SS1 aint up to it - thats for sure!
 
Last edited:
If he were simply the best striker I'd agree.

But there comes a point - where said best striker scores so many goals that this singular ability swamps everything else - and Haaland is a freak goal scorer - and his scoring ability, swamps his technical short-comings, IMO.

I suppose it boils down to what you call "best" - for me, "best" means the player most likely to mean your side wins.

And for me - by that definition - Haaland is best.

If by best - you mean most technical - or best dribbler or whatever - then Haaland isn't close. He's average at best technically. But the guy scores goals at a far greater rate than anyone else in football - so much so that this swamps his technical short comings.
===
Here's my take on "best" footballer.

The best footballer most enhances his side of winning the game. Period.

This encompasses goals scored, goals assisted, team chemistry, to a much lesser extent defense and so on. It's all about winning as a team.

For me - Haaland is the best and I'd trade him for no other.

If you think - by this criterion - who most enhances a team's ability to win - then I'm interested in your opinion.
I get what you're saying but by that criterion, De Bruyne is our best footballer. You could argue Courtois was the best footballer last year.
 
I get what you're saying but by that criterion, De Bruyne is our best footballer. You could argue Courtois was the best footballer last year.
Cheers.

Would much rather:
1) Have KDB injured for the entire season; or
2) Have Courtois instead of Ederson in our side but he somehow is out of the season (this point for sake of argument - I'd much rather have Ederson than Courtois - but let's say instead that Ederson was out for the year) than;
3) Not having Haaland available for the rest of the season.

Not close for me at all - Haaland most important - but this is subjective. We can replace KDB, or Ederson - Haaland out is a much worse hit to our squad.
 
Last edited:
4 hattricks away from matching the most Hattricks in a single season which was by Messi with 8. We have a monster in our team
 
What do you class as a footballer? Someone who knows how to position themselves and has the ability to score lots and lots of goals or someone who is a master of the ball?

Haaland is the best striker in the world. Not the best footballer.

By your own logic, do you also think post-2014 Prime Cristiano Ronaldo was never the best forward in Real Madrid?

After that knee injury, Cristiano's playing style was no different than Haaland, Cristiano was nothing more than just an exceptional goalscorer who depended on service from his teammates. Even someone like Karim Benzema was a better dribbler, passer & more involved in the build-up than Cristiano.

I believe Cristiano was still easily the 2nd best player in the world for years purely due to his crazy goalscoring stats.
 
By your own logic, do you also think post-2014 Prime Cristiano Ronaldo was never the best forward in Real Madrid?

After that knee injury, Cristiano's playing style was no different than Haaland, Cristiano was nothing more than just an exceptional goalscorer who depended on service from his teammates. Even someone like Karim Benzema was a better dribbler, passer & more involved in the build-up than Cristiano.

I believe Cristiano was still easily the 2nd best player in the world for years purely due to his crazy goalscoring stats.
No doubt that Chrstiano was great - but he was an obvious ostentatious prick. So much so that ManU let him go.

And he was an obvious **** for ages. DId this impact his sides - possibly not - but I'm guessing that it did 100%.

Haaland for me is a better scorer than fake Ronaldo - and comes without all of that fucking, "I'm better than you," baggage... or maybe he has that, "I'm better," personality because he takes all of our penalties without objection.

Point being - Haaland seems, to me, to get along with his teammates better than fake Ronaldo - and moreover, is a better goal scorer so far.
 
Scoring goals wins games - and is the hardest part of football.

Haaland is world best in spite of the fact that he's not technically gifted.

Since you dislike Haaland - whom would you trade him for - as he's not the best footballer? I'd probably trade him for Peddri -but no one else.

Fucking hell, Pedri? Seriously?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top