Bit of an oxymoron really because if it wasn't for her government we'd never have had the investment in the country that would facilitate the incarnation of the premier league.samharris said:Bad move..whoever thought of it is a twat..
Thatcher was the enemy of football and covered up Hillsbrough..
Gaylord du Bois said:Bit of an oxymoron really because if it wasn't for her government we'd never have had the investment in the country that would facilitate the incarnation of the premier league.samharris said:Bad move..whoever thought of it is a twat..
Thatcher was the enemy of football and covered up Hillsbrough..
joe mancini said:Rise like lions after slumber!
In unvanquishable number.
Shake your chains to earth like dew
Which in sleep had fallen on you-
Ye are many - they are few.
I'm far from an apologist Stony. It's just an observation of mine,but do you honestly think anyone would have invested in the old game ten years previously.stony said:Gaylord du Bois said:Bit of an oxymoron really because if it wasn't for her government we'd never have had the investment in the country that would facilitate the incarnation of the premier league.samharris said:Bad move..whoever thought of it is a twat..
Thatcher was the enemy of football and covered up Hillsbrough..
So Thatcher is responsible for the Premier league. I've heard her apologists come out with some shit but that takes the cake.
The "savage cuts" in public expenditure had actually been imposed by the IMF in 1976, as a result of bailing out the Labour government. I don't deny it suited the Tories but that's how they started. Another factor that came about as a result of that loan was a change in fiscal policy from pursuing full employment to control of inflation via the money supply. So another Thatcher policy actually originated with her Labour predecessor. And that's not a lie or a statistic.Legallyblue said:There are lies, damned lies and statistics. The apparent slow down in the rate of decline was accounted for by the accelerating shrinkage of the public sector due to savage cuts fostered on us by Thatcher and her neo liberal mentor Keith Joseph.Prestwich_Blue said:I'm laughing at the irony of that statement, which also sums up the implacable anti-Thatcher elements on here.jitsubluedan said:You are a true child of Thatcher as shown by your opening statement which is arrogant and leaves no room for argument; absolutely no room for concensus - just like the woman herself.
The true consensus is that she did some things right and some things wrong and if you really lived through the mid-1970's, you'd know what a fucking mess this country was in at that time.
For every person she put on the scrapheap, she helped others move a rung or more up the ladder, through being able to set up businesses, giving them far more disposable income, allowing them to own their own homes, freeing them from high inflation, giving them access to credit. Inflation was squeezed out of the system and interest rates, apart from a short blip in the late 1980's, went steadily down. Her reduction of taxation rates made it worthwhile to save, which impacts the economy by giving governments access to additional funds.
It's also a myth to say she "destroyed" manufacturing industry. The truth is that it was already declining before she came to power. Between 1970 and 1979, its share of GDP declined by just under 2%. Between 1979 and 1990, the rate of decline actually slowed so that its share of GDP went down by 1.5%.
Now I can't stop you thinking that she was (in your arrogant words that leave no room for argument) "a vile woman" but I can point out that not everyone shares that opinion.