JohnMaddocksAxe said:
Yes, but do you think that Sam, or any other manager, is correct in saying that results and perfomances are nothing to do with him and can't improve until he gets 3/4s of a new squad?
Is this fair, realistic or the actions of a quality manager?
That's what I'm asking on this thread
3/4's of a new squad? That would be in the region of 15-20 players. I haven't seen Hughes or anyone request 15-20 new players. I've seen him suggest 5 new players capable of performing consistently at first team level are required. Who on earth could disagree with that after watching the first half of the season?
If anyone thinks we have a good, balanced squad capable of competing at the top end of the table just have a look at the player profile section on the OS. It's completely unbalanced and utterly threadbare in key areas - 2 rookie keepers; several poor (Ball, TBH, Garrido - yes he's improved, but am yet to be convinced he's top drawer), out of form (Richards, Dunne), perenially injured (Ned) defenders; 1 reliable DM (Kompany) - the rest injured (Johnson), unable to run (Hamann), shit (Gelson); AM - generally excellent (Ireland, SWP) but now riven by injury and badly missing Petrov all season and an infuriating Elano; and a glut of forwards, either injured (Boj, Benjani), not good enough (Vas, Benjani, Jo, Caceido), too young/inconsistent (Studge/Evans/Caceido), with only really Robbie making the grade.
There is some talent there, hence the handsome victories when all goes to plan, but it's too easily undone and when you look at the players at Hughes' disposal it's really no wonder we're struggling.
5 new players of proven PL quality as a minimum, I'd say. And if a galactico wants to come and accept the challenge, then that's fine too.