Wasn't Adam Johnson renting old Tranny C.Ronaldo's old house in Manc with his gorgeous WAG? wonder what will happen to that now he won't be needing it for awhile..
Luke Shaw rents it.
Wasn't Adam Johnson renting old Tranny C.Ronaldo's old house in Manc with his gorgeous WAG? wonder what will happen to that now he won't be needing it for awhile..
You think he should be treated more harshly just because he happens to play football for a living? How very odd.you think one sex offender should get a lesser sentence just because another one did ? How very odd
Not once have I said he should,have I ? All defendants should be sentenced according to the offence.You think he should be treated more harshly just because he happens to play football for a living? How very odd.
In answer to your question. I was merely pointing out to those of you who are hoping he is going to be hung, drawn and quartered, that our judiciary is more balanced than some of the posters on here.
I'm probably going to get accused of being an apologist for sex offenders but in my opinion I hope his sentence reflects that handed out to other people guilty of similar offences and isn't significantly higher in some effort to make an example of him. This is not what British justice is about. He is guilty and deserves to lose his liberty but no more guilty than a number of teachers for example (many of whom female) who a cursory google search will reveal have often received ridiculously low sentences which Johnson has no hope of getting.D-Day today then.
What do you reckon he will get?
Yes there was that Teaching Assistant from Manchester who got 2 years (originally a suspended sentence) despite admitting she had sexual activity with the boy around 80 times.I'm probably going to get accused of being an apologist for sex offenders but in my opinion I hope his sentence reflects that handed out to other people guilty of similar offences and isn't significantly higher in some effort to make an example of him. This is not what British justice is about. He is guilty and deserves to lose his liberty but no more guilty than a number of teachers for example (many of whom female) who a cursory google search will reveal have often received ridiculously low sentences which Johnson has no hope of getting.
I've a feeling this is going to be one of those cases where the book is thrown at him in order to make a wider point. He should get whatever the normal sentence is for the crime he's committed, nothing more, nothing less.I'm probably going to get accused of being an apologist for sex offenders but in my opinion I hope his sentence reflects that handed out to other people guilty of similar offences and isn't significantly higher in some effort to make an example of him. This is not what British justice is about. He is guilty and deserves to lose his liberty but no more guilty than a number of teachers for example (many of whom female) who a cursory google search will reveal have often received ridiculously low sentences which Johnson has no hope of getting.
Did the teaching asst go to trial though? There are so many variables that you cant compare like for like in that way. Johnson will get clobbered for lying and pleading not guilty, and so making the kid go to court and give evidence. It means he gets no credit off his sentence. The other complicating factor for him will be that Faceache campaign bollocks by his sister in which a photo of Johnson holding his baby daughter was used under the banner of wanting justice. That will bite him in the ass and the judge will not look favourably on that. I bet his lawyers were fucking livid when they saw itYes there was that Teaching Assistant from Manchester who got 2 years (originally a suspended sentence) despite admitting she had sexual activity with the boy around 80 times.
Johnson should be hammered for what he's done. However there shouldn't be one rule for one etc...
FWIW I think he'll get 6 years.
And that it isnt odd, its entirely the point. He will get a harsher sentence because hes a footballer because that is the vehicle by which he committed the offence, exploiting the starstruck nature of the girl. Not odd, just facts material to the very caseYou think he should be treated more harshly just because he happens to play football for a living? How very odd.
In answer to your question. I was merely pointing out to those of you who are hoping he is going to be hung, drawn and quartered, that our judiciary is more balanced than some of the posters on here.