GOULDYBOBS
Well-Known Member
Shame it didn't work out for the lad. Good luck blue
Harrison’s fee was increased to £10mil but he looks like he is worth more than that with his performances for Leeds in the opening 3 games of the season.The upside would have been a good base fee and/or a buyback. Imagine us doing the same thing with Douglas Luiz, we'd be looking like absolute fools not inserting a buyback. If the fee is so low, atleast protect ourselves with a reasonable buyback so if he turns out well, we could potentially use him as 2nd choice RCB in a year or two from now.
It's not a case of it being our model, but you cannot simply be lazy negotiating exits and hide behind that. This is a poor deal and whoever was in charge of it deserves severe criticism for it. I complain because I don't want another Sancho situation (though that case was very different and I don't hold the club accountable). I want the club to be run the best possible way and to see such a poor deal being negotiated especially on the back of the obligation to buy of Angelino at 16m and option to buy of Jack Harrison at 8m makes me think the people in charge of negotiating deals are poor at their jobs.
We have done some good business at times though , rabbi matondo never played a senior game , was sold for like 12 mill I believe to Schalke.So as it turns out, he's not needed by City, neither of West Ham or Everton actually stepped up their interest and made a bid, the latter signed Godfrey from Norwich instead. Fulham did, and it worked out. Simple.
Regardless of how bad the numbers of this deal are, a move was the right decision, you can debate the numbers all day when this club has never really been good at selling, but you somehow expect them to be good at it now.