You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Adebayor
- Thread starter Bombo
- Start date
Skashion
Well-Known Member
Re: Ade bye bye or.
For the purpose of the first two monitoring periods, i.e. monitoring periods
assessed in the seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15, the following additional
transitional factor is to be considered by the Club Financial Control Panel:
Players under contract before 1 June 2010
If a licensee reports an aggregate break-even deficit that exceeds the
acceptable deviation and it fulfils both conditions described below then this
would be taken into account in a favourable way.
i) It reports a positive trend in the annual break-even results (proving it has
implemented a concrete strategy for future compliance); and
ii) It proves that the aggregate break-even deficit is only due to the annual
break-even deficit of the reporting period ending in 2012 which in turn is
due to contracts with players undertaken prior to 1 June 2010 (for the
avoidance of doubt, all renegotiations on contracts undertaken after such
date would not be taken into account).
This means that a licensee that reports an aggregate break-even deficit that
exceeds the acceptable deviation but that satisfies both conditions described
under i) and ii) above should in principle not be sanctioned.
moomba said:Skashion said:To those saying this has implications for FFP, are you absolutely sure? The rules disregard those signed before June 2010 if it means you don't break-even so why should you be able to sell players you've signed prior to June 2010 and still have them count? It's a one-way street.
I think amortisation of players signed before 2010 still counts.
For the purpose of the first two monitoring periods, i.e. monitoring periods
assessed in the seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15, the following additional
transitional factor is to be considered by the Club Financial Control Panel:
Players under contract before 1 June 2010
If a licensee reports an aggregate break-even deficit that exceeds the
acceptable deviation and it fulfils both conditions described below then this
would be taken into account in a favourable way.
i) It reports a positive trend in the annual break-even results (proving it has
implemented a concrete strategy for future compliance); and
ii) It proves that the aggregate break-even deficit is only due to the annual
break-even deficit of the reporting period ending in 2012 which in turn is
due to contracts with players undertaken prior to 1 June 2010 (for the
avoidance of doubt, all renegotiations on contracts undertaken after such
date would not be taken into account).
This means that a licensee that reports an aggregate break-even deficit that
exceeds the acceptable deviation but that satisfies both conditions described
under i) and ii) above should in principle not be sanctioned.
Re: Ade bye bye or.
Nope..just ask Chelsea.
Andouble said:must all 25 spaces be filled?
Nope..just ask Chelsea.
Re: Ade bye bye or.
but isn't it if you don't have 25, or not enough English/homegrown players, then you can only have something like 19? I didn't think there was any middle ground.
samharris said:Andouble said:must all 25 spaces be filled?
Nope..just ask Chelsea.
but isn't it if you don't have 25, or not enough English/homegrown players, then you can only have something like 19? I didn't think there was any middle ground.
svennis pennis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Messages
- 12,005
Re: Ade bye bye or.
19 goals in 36 games. I'll be amazed if Dzeko gets anywhere near that in his next 34 games.
Absolutely baffling.
19 goals in 36 games. I'll be amazed if Dzeko gets anywhere near that in his next 34 games.
Absolutely baffling.
Re: Adebayor (whispers from MCFC)
So you weren't WUMming in the Lukaku thread. Where abouts are you from exactly?
Black Solied said:Cant wait to see Cristiano Ronaldo (my idol) to hug Adebayor on the pitch. They are going to have fun together joking :D
So you weren't WUMming in the Lukaku thread. Where abouts are you from exactly?
mcfcliam
Well-Known Member
Re: Ade bye bye or.
So we let Ade go but not the nothingness that is Jo?
Okay then.....
So we let Ade go but not the nothingness that is Jo?
Okay then.....
brummie blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 9,080
Re: Ade bye bye or.
a little harsh
sibierski express said:Do they want Lescott as well?
a little harsh
brummie blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 9,080
Re: Ade bye bye or.
shame we can't arrange a swap deal for the summer.... Ozil perhaps
shame we can't arrange a swap deal for the summer.... Ozil perhaps
Re: Ade bye bye or.
hows about benzema or kakabrummie blue said:shame we can't arrange a swap deal for the summer.... Ozil perhaps