I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 23,118
It's not about that at all, it's about the fact that misogyny exists in all cultures, and so needs to be addressed in all cultures. If boys from certain cultures are more likely to have misogynistic attitudes, then surely they will benefit more from any intervention and you should be in favour of it?The race swap in adolescence is one example of this. Knife crime and fatherlessness, for instance ,is strongly a function of race, and the makers of this series are clearly afraid to tackle that.
Blaming Rochdale on "misogyny" is another prime example of pretending all of society is "misogynistic". And thereby pretending that all cultures are equally likely to engage in such activities.
And who's pretending all society is misogynistic? When we teach kids that it's wrong to steal or hurt animals or be racist, is it because we think that 'all of society' are thieves or animal abusers or racists, or is it because we don't know ahead of time who will have those tendencies? Or perhaps we want to create a culture of calling out such behaviour? To make it socially unacceptable to behave in certain ways or make certain sorts of comments. As far as I know, this has definitely worked with homophobia since I was in school, with kids being pretty quick to jump on homophobic remarks from their peers, for example. When I was in school, you could call someone 'gay' as an insult in front of the teacher and they wouldn't mention it. When my dad was a kid, you could do the same with racist comments.
