citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 17,939
I suspect that might be the pointIt's all a revenue exercise and the easiest way to fuck them off is don't speed
I suspect that might be the pointIt's all a revenue exercise and the easiest way to fuck them off is don't speed
That may be true, but it’s almost impossible to keep sufficient distances on our motorways, do that and somebody will move into the gap you’ve left.Fair enough. There must be some leeway as you see cars go past you when doing 70 in smart motorway zones and they don’t get flashed.
I got done once in 2003 when a mobile camera got me doing 56mph in a 50mph motorway roadworks zone. Had to take the points.
Got done in 2016 at the lights near city, again just over the 10% and did a speed awareness course.
Anybody who says they haven’t sped isn’t being truthful. Cruise control is great for smart motorways.
Speed doesn’t kill, lack of distance between you and the car in front does.
Tailgaiting at 70mph on a motorway is far more dangerous than doing say 90mph with sufficient distance for you to react in time.
Of course, but then all you can do is keep that safe distance again. It’s hard to speed in rush hour.That may be true, but it’s almost impossible to keep sufficient distances on our motorways, do that and somebody will move into the gap you’ve left.
If it was all about the money, it'd be more cost effective to fine you and register points on your licenceDid one about 10 years ago, doing 36 in a 30 at 2 in the morning. The 'course' lasted 4 1/2 fucking hours, full of middle aged folk going marginally over the limit, kept my mouth shut and got signed off. It's literally all about the money, no discretion like there used to be.
You can trundle along the "smart" motorways at 75 and not get flashed, so I would say so.Do these new digital cameras still have the same 10% leeway?
Fair enough. There must be some leeway as you see cars go past you when doing 70 in smart motorway zones and they don’t get flashed.
I got done once in 2003 when a mobile camera got me doing 56mph in a 50mph motorway roadworks zone. Had to take the points.
Got done in 2016 at the lights near city, again just over the 10% and did a speed awareness course.
Anybody who says they haven’t sped isn’t being truthful. Cruise control is great for smart motorways.
Speed doesn’t kill, lack of distance between you and the car in front does.
Tailgaiting at 70mph on a motorway is far more dangerous than doing say 90mph with sufficient distance for you to react in time.
Fair question and only one that could answer with what I perceive to be enough when travelling at that speed.This isn’t a trick question. But in normal conditions, how far do you reckon sufficient distance is for you to react at 90mph?
500 feet approximately if you leave that there would be half a dozen nipped in between.This isn’t a trick question. But in normal conditions, how far do you reckon sufficient distance is for you to react at 90mph?
Just did this course there 2 weeks ago, I actually picked up a few good driving tips which I've started using.Holiday Inn express Debdale Park in January for my next re education, I'm looking forward to it immensely cheaper than the fine and no points plus afternoon off what's not to like.
Report it stolen and torch it somewhere shit.Thought I’d jump on the back of this thread…
My daughter has been done twice within an hour for speeding by a mobile going to and from a venue. Any experts think she has any grounds to appeal one or is she up the creek?
Sounds like the latter. Just being nosey here, but on what grounds do you think she could appeal? By the way; twice? Within an hour? Once can be classed as unlucky. Twice? Hmm.Thought I’d jump on the back of this thread…
My daughter has been done twice within an hour for speeding by a mobile going to and from a venue. Any experts think she has any grounds to appeal one or is she up the creek?
She was taking grandson to a swimming lesson, got done once on the way once on the way back.Sounds like the latter. Just being nosey here, but on what grounds do you think she could appeal? By the way; twice? Within an hour? Once can be classed as unlucky. Twice? Hmm.
No harm asking.She was taking grandson to a swimming lesson, got done once on the way once on the way back.
I think they’ve accepted their fate, but just thought I’d check
We do have some ‘experts’ on here…No harm asking.