Agreed, the lanky **** needs fucking off.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Aguero banned for three games (updated)
- Thread starter citytill1die84
- Start date
der bomber28
Well-Known Member
So by this rationale, bog brush will be getting retrospective bans every week, won't he? Won't hold my breath, more proof(if any was needed) of the unbridled bias, shown by the so called media and fa towards us. Where's the media shit storm, when bog brush is committing acts a million times worse than this? Where was the shit storm after Bardsley's dangerous challenge on Silva? Where's the shit storm regarding Costa's constant dirty tricks? Fuckin nowhere, and some people still believe there isn't an agenda. Really is a different set of rules applied to us, and it's really fucking me off now. Still perplexed how someone with a vetted interest in the rags is allowed to be part of the fa(conflict of interest anyone?) Someone should send those screenshots to the fa, questioning the validity of marriner's statement, showing he's an outright liar, with no moral fibre. I really hope we spank the rag muppets so badly now.
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 10,553
He was actually heavily involved in our best play. But basing anything on 1 game is dumb as fook. He has scored 7.
His mere presence on the pitch gives others more room. Any team would miss Aguero
I agree with what you're saying but can also understand where SWP's back is coming from as well. We're not so one direct as to just constantly look for Aguero all the time, others have started finding themselves in the box more, especially Sterling and Nolito, along with De Bruyne and Silva. So I guess what SWP's back is saying is that we don't have to rely on Aguero to grab us the goals all the time like we have done the last 3 years.
Can't complain tbh. Stupid from him but it felt like 50/50 if he deserved a ban or not. From one angle he looks innocent but guilty from another and by the looks of it he didnt really hit him. That Marriner said he didn't see anything is just insane though. Needs to be banned for three games as well if thats the case.
Deepest Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2010
- Messages
- 9,892
We are loaded with top players and a coach savvy enough to use them correctly.He was actually heavily involved in our best play. But basing anything on 1 game is dumb as fook. He has scored 7.
His mere presence on the pitch gives others more room. Any team would miss Aguero
We'll miss Sergio but not as much as the Rags hope we will.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
So basically Marriner has finally come out and admitted he's an incompetent **** who's unable to see something going on right in front of him, 2 yards away. Should be disqualified.
If it's so fair and above board why is it that City players are the ones who get charged by the FA Disciplinary Committee? It may have happened, but I can not recall it, that a Utd player got an FA retrospective charge.They pushed nothing, SKY and the BBC review these incidents fairly and would have done had it been Rooney or Costa. It's just been spoken about more because Aguero isn't really known to do things like this.
If this was Balotelli back in his City day's we would all be calling him an idiot, but because it's Aguero it's been treated as some sort of vendetta or conspiracy.
The process is bent. Aguero's challenge was far from the worst in the world seeing as he didn't touch Reid and it was Reid who clattered into him.
der bomber28
Well-Known Member
Think the brown envelope has already landed on Clattenbergs door mat as he is probably gonna get the derby game
I'd actually bet my house, that he IS the ref for the derby.
Along with his linesman. They were terrible all game......Matsuoka, whose cross led to their goal, should have been sent off for persistent fouls. I think he was the one who did StonesSo basically Marriner has finally come out and admitted he's an incompetent **** who's unable to see something going on right in front of him, 2 yards away. Should be disqualified.
CitizenTID
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 5,053
They have quite clearly pushed it as headline news.They pushed nothing, SKY and the BBC review these incidents fairly and would have done had it been Rooney or Costa. It's just been spoken about more because Aguero isn't really known to do things like this.
If this was Balotelli back in his City day's we would all be calling him an idiot, but because it's Aguero it's been treated as some sort of vendetta or conspiracy.
Regardless, he didn't elbow him - it was his hand that caught him on the follow through of what could just as easily be deemed Aguero shrugging Reid off after he'd just been pushed - the height difference means it's hard for Sergio to estimate where the intended shoulder/upper body is from the head so it makes it look bad.
No that's not a shit excuse, there is something in that somewhere i'm sure.