Or he's out for at least 4 games regardless hence nothing to lose. Hopefully your suggestion.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Aguero banned for three games (updated)
- Thread starter citytill1die84
- Start date
Or he's out for at least 4 games regardless hence nothing to lose. Hopefully your suggestion.
Vienna_70
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 40,836
- Location
- 100, 32, 106, +79, 19
- Team supported
- Treble Winners 2022/23.
so with it looking on the cards he'll get banned I'm guessing it's all about intent, as the actual contact looks minimal ....
And yet, A&E's elbows have made contact with several players' faces, but he's only been directly banned for one incident.
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Just showed it again on sky sports although Sergio goes back with his elbow it brushes past reids cheek with no contact for me,but it's the intent which will see him banned not even if he hasn't caught him,but stranger things have happened so let's wait and see..
Delighted we are appealing. I presume the club asked Aguero if he intended to elbow or lash out at Reid and he responded that he didn't...which is what I believe I've seen....i.e. normal on the ball tussling that when slowed down can look wrong. I'd imagine too that Aguero is sickened by Reid's over reaction. (reminds me of RVP's public letter - what a tool!)
I'd prefer to lose and have an extra 1 game ban than to roll over.
I'd not be so principled if we had a final in the next 4 games though. :-)
I'd prefer to lose and have an extra 1 game ban than to roll over.
I'd not be so principled if we had a final in the next 4 games though. :-)
FanchesterCity
Well-Known Member
It doesn't have to be conclusive to be frivolous.
'Conclusive' and 'frivolous' are both at their discretion.
It would be interesting to know the percentage of successful appeals / challenges.
'Conclusive' and 'frivolous' are both at their discretion.
It would be interesting to know the percentage of successful appeals / challenges.
Last edited:
uwe rosler 28
Well-Known Member
If I have this rite all 3 ex rags I mean refs have to all agree it was red if 1 says it was a yellow he gets off?
mrtwiceaseason
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 7,681
And he wasn't fit for the derby !!!Fuck me can't see how we are going to win this,but there you go,if they reject his appeal will it be four game ban? Anyhow fair play if they think they can win this,the uproar it would cause if aguero did win the appeal especially from rags haha..
There must be something in the rules that has made us go for it. Given the referees position, maybe our argument would be they might as well bring in video refs if they arent going to go with a refs decision from point blank range.
It wont be a frivolous appeal either, as that would be something along the lines of us only appealing so the ruling would be after the United game, meaning he could play... which wont be the case here.
It wont be a frivolous appeal either, as that would be something along the lines of us only appealing so the ruling would be after the United game, meaning he could play... which wont be the case here.
mrtwiceaseason
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 7,681
That's ridiculous it was clearly nasri !The defence is mistaken identity. It was Bony.
JamesMCFC
Well-Known Member
I'd also point out to the FA, if the match wasn't televised, would he have been charged? You know, since the ref didn't see it and didn't put it in his match report?