Aguero banned for three games (updated)

Bilic said there was nothing in the incident and he coming off was a planned sub
The ref has to give permission for the trainers to come on the pitch.
How can he say he hasn't seen it and then let the trainers on treat an injury ?
 
The conclusions of the mini meeting held in Cheadle are as follows:-

1 He'll lose and probably get four matches but we've fired a warning shot at the FA.

2 If they fuck about with us during the derby we'll not take it lying down.

3 He probably won't be fit to play anyway.
 
Just taking a look at rag cafe..... oh dear

Corrupt Bertie FA doing their best to help him put his argument forward.

Berties and their FA are shit scared of us, dreading playing us on the 10th and want Aguero to be a part of it. They won't let us win the league easy lads, you can me sure of that. It's going to stink, stink like stunk at the end of last season when Berties were given all decisions in their favour to help them qualify for 4th. Can't have baldy in the Europa, can we?

Their having mini meetings in Stockport reading through the rule books and finding out ways to change the rules so elbows can put in a solid appeal and avoid the ban.

Bertie cnuts.
Yes love it ,you can smell the fear!we don't need serge anyway to beat them ,we've got to much for them.kelechi will give it em.
 
city are just not going to appeal for appeals sake, there is something that we have taken apart with this and it's odds on we will win the case with whatever it is otherwise the ban would be accepted and we move on,we have some very clever people down at city who are paid a fortune to defend these type of cases, i'm pretty confident with this one
 
Might be wide of the mark but maybe the FA felt like they had to be seen to be doing something cos of all the media frenzy... And now an 'independent panel' will be given the job of clearing him but the FA can say it's not their decision
 
We must have some good lawyers or whoever fight these charges if we're appealing?
On the contrary. I could appeal and win this case. The rule (if correctly quoted on here) says they can only review off the ball incidents. This wasn't an off the ball incident, so it should never have gone to a charge.
 
It's being discussed on radio 5 now. Sam visits and Henry winter reckon that city are contesting it by taking advantage of a "loophole" whereby if the ref "saw" the incident then no retrospective action can be taken.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.