kaz7
Well-Known Member
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
He is just making numbers up as he goes along
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
You must have misread/misunderstood my post - I am no defender of Johnson - just pointing out the actions of a few that distract from genuine discussion and deserved criticismAgenda of bile,? I think you mistake agenda for criticism of the prime minister. Positions on here are entrenched which stifles meaningful debate, it happens on both sides mate. I despise Johnson and everything he stands for but if he does a solid job then fair enough. In my opinion he isn't do a solid job, he's adding a lot of spin to a desperate national crisis, he would get a free ride from me if he was honest, he isn't and I'll call out anyone claiming he is doing a good job.
You do post some utter bollocksTo endorse any politician on any issue is to endorse them wholly. You may recall how you were at the forefront of lambasting everyone who supported Corbyn on any single manifesto issue as buying into his communist anti-semitism because it all comes as a package. Your support for Johnson over is support for Johnson whatever - its like saying " yes Fred West was an evil wicked man but tell you what he did lay a good patio...."
You do post some utter bollocks
That could only make any sense whatsoever to people with very disturbed minds
Oh dear the £900m health surcharge figure quoted by Johnson in PMQ's was pure bollocks. That was the health surcharge paid by everyone who paid it over the last 4 year period - he was quoting it as what could be expected from health care workers. So what is it? Is he lazy and not reading the brief? Is he stupid and not understanding the brief? Or is it yet another lie to the House? Turns out the real cost is just over £1m per year.
His researchers will do the figures not him, I imagine he got flustered and just fucked it up or he needs new researchers. Either way it's not good that our PM is quoting the wrong figuresOh dear the £900m health surcharge figure quoted by Johnson in PMQ's was pure bollocks. That was the health surcharge paid by everyone who paid it over the last 4 year period - he was quoting it as what could be expected from health care workers. So what is it? Is he lazy and not reading the brief? Is he stupid and not understanding the brief? Or is it yet another lie to the House? Turns out the real cost is just over £1m per year.
His researchers will do the figures not him, I imagine he got flustered and just fucked it up or he needs new researchers. Either way it's not good that our PM is quoting the wrong figures
He seems to get bored with detail but it goes with the job, people look to the PM for leadership and information, I think we've lost our way a little, there doesn't appear to be any scrutiny or holding our politicians to account for avoiding questions or lying. I don't see him lasting a term at this rate, Rees mogg will be plotting, he is one creepy little.fuckerones that bear no relation to the truth more to the point - given that he probably had intensive coaching over the preceding days to counter Starmer I'd say it just shows Johnson and detail are strangers - I think back to the letter his teacher at Eton sent to his parents.....
Whilst I accept style isn’t everything, can we all accept the PM should at least run a comb through is hair? His ruffled hair, Have I Got News For You routine has run its course and is extremely inappropriate