Alexandole Boris de Pfeffel Johnson

mat said:
Fuck you. Fuck all of you tory bastards and Gammons who leant your vote to this ****. Reading The latest story online you probably voted for a rapist in the weinstein mode as well. You facilitated this. As far as im concerned all you fuckers that voted tory because of "Banter Bozza" are complicit.

It will never be your fault you enabled him. Itll be remoaners, illegal migrants, wokies, or some other straw man you'll use to deny the fact you gave this **** a majority to do what the fuck he wanted.


I hope you are all pleased with yourselves.
Click to expand...

Fuck 'em for voting this tw@ in...

 
mat said:
Fuck you. Fuck all of you tory bastards and Gammons who leant your vote to this ****. Reading The latest story online you probably voted for a rapist in the weinstein mode as well. You facilitated this. As far as im concerned all you fuckers that voted tory because of "Banter Bozza" are complicit.

It will never be your fault you enabled him. Itll be remoaners, illegal migrants, wokies, or some other straw man you'll use to deny the fact you gave this **** a majority to do what the fuck he wanted.


I hope you are all pleased with yourselves.
Click to expand...
The way your post started I thought it would end with you announcing you're off to walk your white ass back across 8 Mile!

To your point though, they are the party big on 'personal responsibility' who never actually own any of their own shit.
 
bluethrunthru said:
Really? Really ? Come on fella's the first 10 years of speeches and books are gonna be

1/ Churchill - whadda guy
2/ Churchill - how much I was his natural successor
3/ Churchill - how I followed his strategy - wartime not electoral
4/ Churchill - My Churchill based strategy that won the was in Ukraine
5/ Churchill - How Zelensky's rejection of his strategy that was nothing to do with me led to his defeat
6/ Shakespeare - Whadda guy - repeat to fade
Click to expand...

Churchill - Oh yes, yes, yes…
 
bobmcfc said:


Only just seen this. Slimy bastard
Click to expand...

Some interesting comments underneath that tweet. It’s only speculation but some reckon that now he is toast this is only the start and there will be far more stories like this coming out from hereon in.

Listening to that audio is pretty disturbing, especially when he snaps without warning. I think it could well turn out that he’s even more of a wrong ‘un than many of us thought.
 
M18CTID said:
Some interesting comments underneath that tweet. It’s only speculation but some reckon that now he is toast this is only the start and there will be far more stories like this coming out from hereon in.

Listening to that audio is pretty disturbing, especially when he snaps without warning. I think it could well turn out that he’s even more of a wrong ‘un than many of us thought.
Click to expand...
Hopefully it is the start and hopefully they go after the rest of the seedy wankers before he gets a Chance to put any of them in the house of lords.
 
M18CTID said:
Some interesting comments underneath that tweet. It’s only speculation but some reckon that now he is toast this is only the start and there will be far more stories like this coming out from hereon in.

Listening to that audio is pretty disturbing, especially when he snaps without warning. I think it could well turn out that he’s even more of a wrong ‘un than many of us thought.
Click to expand...

This guy is in charge of the country until the Autumn, how scary is that? He should be removed from office and all his belongings dumped on horse guards parade for him to collect.
 
Eebo said:
So he can't carry on leading the Conservative Party because he is not a fit leader as they have just noticed his continuous lies and despicable lack of morals, but despite that they are happy for him to carry on leading the Country for a couple more months?

Shows where their real priorities lie.
Click to expand...
The Tory party have the mandate, not Johnson. So, if he is no longer leader of the party then technically he cannot be PM.
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
The Tory party have the mandate, not Johnson. So, if he is no longer leader of the party then technically he cannot be PM.
Click to expand...
He could lose the leadership and still remain PM under our constitution. The only person with the legal authority to remove him is the monarch. If it were anyone else, I’d agree with you, and he’d be gone. But with this **** we may well need Her Maj to pull the metaphorical trigger.
 
Seems Johnson’s client press will happily tear apart every candidate for PM in the hope that MPs will accept a half arsed apology from Johnson and let him stay on. If they don’t get rid of him in the next week it might even work.
 
johnnytapia said:
He could lose the leadership and still remain PM under our constitution. The only person with the legal authority to remove him is the monarch. If it were anyone else, I’d agree with you, and he’d be gone. But with this **** we may well need Her Maj to pull the metaphorical trigger.
Click to expand...

The PM position is held by the leader of the party.
If he didn't acquiesce (for whatever reason), I could see the whips throwing him out to prevent dragging the queen into it.

He must have some ambitions left though, and it would burn him forever if he refused to go. The Knight of the Garter position that comes in time to ex-prime ministers would never come his way.
 
west didsblue said:
Seems Johnson’s client press will happily tear apart every candidate for PM in the hope that MPs will accept a half arsed apology from Johnson and let him stay on. If they don’t get rid of him in the next week it might even work.
Click to expand...

He'll certainly be trying to rig who remains in the race - they get to give honours out!
 
MillionMilesAway said:
The PM position is held by the leader of the party.
If he didn't acquiesce (for whatever reason), I could see the whips throwing him out to prevent dragging the queen into it.

He must have some ambitions left though, and it would burn him forever if he refused to go. The Knight of the Garter position that comes in time to ex-prime ministers would never come his way.
Click to expand...
All true but constitutionally, only the monarch has the legal authority to remove him. Not been exercised for over 200 years but this **** could change that. Never knew that about Knight of Garter. We have some great, arcane rules!
 
johnnytapia said:
All true but constitutionally, only the monarch has the legal authority to remove him. Not been exercised for over 200 years but this **** could change that. Never knew that about Knight of Garter. We have some great, arcane rules!
Click to expand...

KG is a custom, rather than rule.
It's the monarch's choice, but previous ones have got it, and in order. The time it takes to get them varies though - Major got his in 2005 (8 years after), Blair got his this year (14 years on), Thatcher was 5 years on.

Although it still has to go through Brown (presumably), Cameron, May - so it could be a long time yet - I'd think it may count against him. Theoretically, the monarch could fill the remaining places beforehand (there are 4 of the 24 free).

I don't know for certain, but I'd think the constitutional position is arguable, having not been tested recently. I'd think a refusal to leave is unlikely, and would be catastrophic for him and his party.
 
MillionMilesAway said:
KG is a custom, rather than rule.
It's the monarch's choice, but previous ones have got it, and in order. The time it takes to get them varies though - Major got his in 2005 (8 years after), Blair got his this year (14 years on), Thatcher was 5 years on.

Although it still has to go through Brown (presumably), Cameron, May - so it could be a long time yet - I'd think it may count against him. Theoretically, the monarch could fill the remaining places beforehand (there are 4 of the 24 free).

I don't know for certain, but I'd think the constitutional position is arguable, having not been tested recently. I'd think a refusal to leave is unlikely, and would be catastrophic for him and his party.
Click to expand...
Which 24 places? Knights of Garter?
 
MillionMilesAway said:
KG is a custom, rather than rule.
It's the monarch's choice, but previous ones have got it, and in order. The time it takes to get them varies though - Major got his in 2005 (8 years after), Blair got his this year (14 years on), Thatcher was 5 years on.

Although it still has to go through Brown (presumably), Cameron, May - so it could be a long time yet - I'd think it may count against him. Theoretically, the monarch could fill the remaining places beforehand (there are 4 of the 24 free).

I don't know for certain, but I'd think the constitutional position is arguable, having not been tested recently. I'd think a refusal to leave is unlikely, and would be catastrophic for him and his party.
Click to expand...
The only KG he'll get is a Kick in the Goolies.
 
bobmcfc said:


Only just seen this. Slimy bastard
Click to expand...

Misconduct in public office? This might be relevant for the CPS...

(1) A public officer has requested or demanded sexual acts in exchange for using their position or power to benefit (or avoid detriment) to another person. For example, an immigration official requesting sexual favours from an asylum seeker in exchange for granting them refugee status.

(2) A public officer has engaged in sexual activity with someone they have met or gained access to in the course of their work and, while “consensual”, the sexual conduct is considered to amount to a breach of public trust in the office holder due to the misuse of the position and the particular vulnerability of that person.

If consent was not freely given, then the possibility of a rape charge arises:

The CPS publishes a document entitled “What is consent”, which breaks down some of the key issues for police and prosecutors to consider in interpreting the law, and challenges some common myths and stereotypes. Among the factors highlighted in relation to “freedom to consent” are: Where the suspect was in a position of power where they could abuse their trust, especially because of their position or status – e.g. a family member, teacher, religious leader, employer, gang member, carer, doctor.

References culled from:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top