The so called CCJ against Johnson is from an allegation of defamation of an anti vax nutter who regularly takes legal action against various members of the government.

It is complete and utter bollocks and hugely embarrassing for all the media outlets that have run with it.

why is it bollocks? Its a CCJ recorded at the court - they haven't fabricated it.
 
why is it bollocks? Its a CCJ recorded at the court - they haven't fabricated it.
It’s bollocks as Johnson has never referenced this nutter and as it is entirely without merit it should have been scrubbed. She is called Yvonne Hobbs and she launches multiple county court actions against all sorts of public figures and organisations.


I could do the same and claim that Keir Starmer has defamed me, for instance.
 
The so called CCJ against Johnson is from an allegation of defamation of an anti vax nutter who regularly takes legal action against various members of the government.

It is complete and utter bollocks and hugely embarrassing for all the media outlets that have run with it.


The fact that they have run with such a nonsensical story (if what you are saying is correct) then it would indicate that the knives are out for him.
 
It’s bollocks as Johnson has never referenced this nutter and as it is entirely without merit it should have been scrubbed. She is called Yvonne Hobbs and she launches multiple county court actions against all sorts of public figures and organisations.


I could do the same and claim that Keir Starmer has defamed me, for instance.

Your assertion was the story was bollocks - however, as it stands, there is a CCJ outstanding in his name for his current address ergo that is news. The background as to the who/what/when/why is coming out as the story develops but that does of course give the press more sunshine in which to make hay and it begs the question what was going on at number 10? Who on the staff should have picked up on the correspondence they WILL have received from the courts telling them of the action and the results?
 
Your assertion was the story was bollocks - however, as it stands, there is a CCJ outstanding in his name for his current address ergo that is news. The background as to the who/what/when/why is coming out as the story develops but that does of course give the press more sunshine in which to make hay and it begs the question what was going on at number 10? Who on the staff should have picked up on the correspondence they WILL have received from the courts telling them of the action and the results?
You are getting desperate now.

There was no need to respond to such an action and it clearly is an error on the part of the system. She is a complete nutter and hopefully it’s going to cost her money.
 
So you advocate financial penalties for people who suffer with mental health problems.

It is obvious you are a Tory, you have had an empathy bypass.
Nutter as in anti vax / conspiracy theorist. I have no idea if she has mental health issues and neither do you.

I’d describe you as a left wing nutter and you’d describe me similarly as a Tory whatever.
 
Nutter as in anti vax / conspiracy theorist. I have no idea if she has mental health issues and neither do you.

I’d describe you as a left wing nutter and you’d describe me similarly as a Tory whatever.
Do you think that people taken in by these myriad conspiracies and related nonsensical theories are normal then.

I did not call you a nutter, I said you are a typical Tory.
 
Do you think that people taken in by these myriad conspiracies and related nonsensical theories are normal then.

I did not call you a nutter, I said you are a typical Tory.
What’s normal?

People with outlandish beliefs that don’t necessarily coincide with mine don’t automatically have mental health issues.
 
You are getting desperate now.

There was no need to respond to such an action and it clearly is an error on the part of the system. She is a complete nutter and hopefully it’s going to cost her money.

Its not an error on the part of the system its the exceptionalism at the top which chose to ignore what was happening and it will go away but it didn't. Had Private Eye not report this originally we could have had bailiffs calling on number 10. I can see you love Johnson and forgive him all his sins but your understanding of all this is woeful as is your analysis.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.