The so called CCJ against Johnson is from an allegation of defamation of an anti vax nutter who regularly takes legal action against various members of the government.

It is complete and utter bollocks and hugely embarrassing for all the media outlets that have run with it.
Do you realise how Trumpish that sounds?


If you'd phrased it better I might have been inclined to research it.
 
Just popped in to have a look around and noticed the same lefties wasting their lives on here.

Have you really nothing better to do? 1448 pages of bitter resentment.
 
Just popped in to have a look around and noticed the same lefties wasting their lives on here.

Have you really nothing better to do? 1448 pages of bitter resentment.
Over the space of a mere two and a half years at an average 1.5 pages a day is absolute conclusive proof that those who post on this thread have absolutely nothing better to do. Thank you for taking time out from your very busy and fulfilling life to point it out
 
Over the space of a mere two and a half years at an average 1.5 pages a day is absolute conclusive proof that those who post on this thread have absolutely nothing better to do. Thank you for taking time out from your very busy and fulfilling life to point it out
You're most welcome. I'll pop back in another month or two and spot IfIwasonly, Rascal, bluthruandthru and Len and god knows who else all muttering to themselves, I have no doubt.
 
The so called CCJ against Johnson is from an allegation of defamation of an anti vax nutter who regularly takes legal action against various members of the government.

It is complete and utter bollocks and hugely embarrassing for all the media outlets that have run with it.
You fucking idiot.
A CCJ can only be awarded for an unpaid financial debt.
 
You fucking idiot.
A CCJ can only be awarded for an unpaid financial debt.

According to the BBC, it's what happens when someone applies to what was the small claims court, and the accused party don't reply to the papers sent to them. As no defence is offered, the claim is upheld initially.

As someone said earlier, the bafflement is not that the claim got put in and has now been thrown out, but that it was completely ignored for 6 months. At best, it's negligent, at worst it's contempt for the system.
 
Hmm. A fucking idiot you say?

BBC News - Boris Johnson's lawyers confident of cancelling court judgement

but ....but....but you said it was all bollocks .........how do you cancel a court judgement that doesn't exist? Why are his lawyers trying to cancel a non-existent judgement ? And if reporting its existence was all bollocks why are you posting a news report that must be bollocks as its about something that doesn't exist?
 
but ....but....but you said it was all bollocks .........how do you cancel a court judgement that doesn't exist? Why are his lawyers trying to cancel a non-existent judgement ? And if reporting its existence was all bollocks why are you posting a news report that must be bollocks as its about something that doesn't exist?
I never said it didn't exist. I did say it was all bollocks, which it is. Why would I claim it didn't exist when I stated that it was a defamation accusation by an anti vaxer named Yvonne Hobbs.

You seem to be tying yourself up in knots rather than graciously accepting that it is bollocks.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.