Alexandole Boris de Pfeffel Johnson

[Gabriel]

The problem here is like the wallpaper in the flat it's been going on for so long with nearly every day a 'new' revelation saying the same thing (he had a cheese and wine party in the back garden) that it just becomes background noise. Boris will go at some point prior to the next ge I think, but not now - this is just the latest in a string of things every week that we are giddily told he can't survive.

I've long held that they'll only dispense with his services after the public inquiry. They'll see to it that he isn't blamed for it, of course, but they'll use that moment to draw a line under his stewardship and prepare the ground for the next General Election. No degree of high dudgeon over refurbishments, quiz nights, and nibbles will change that.

 

[Marlo]

Worst PM ever? How have we got to this position where we have a sleazy liar as PM? The world are laughing at us.

Not defending him, but his bona fide and previous character was there for all to see.

He was never a honest politician, journalist or husband. He hasn't conned the British public by pretending to be something he isn't and then when he became PM, whipping off the mask like a scooby doo villain.

He is behaving exactly like he has always done. He is exactly what the electorate ordered. The responsibility for this in my view lies with the electorate.

 

[manchester blue]

Sorry, forgot to say, *lying charlatan scum.

*Angela Rayner didn’t go far enough.

She needs to be careful but I don't think she is that bright, as her past ramblings have proven.

If she assists in getting rid the Tories will likely get someone better, or at least less deceitful, and make it even more difficult for her and her estranged leader to get in.

In a way she'd be better supporting him!

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

Not defending him, but his bona fide and previous character was there for all to see.

He was never a honest politician, journalist or husband. He hasn't conned the British public by pretending to be something he isn't and then when he became PM, whipping off the mask like a scooby doo villain.

He is behaving exactly like he has always done. He is exactly what the electorate ordered. The responsibility for this in my view lies with the electorate.

He is no different from any of his predecessors ..... Camerons been caught out in lobbying scandal, Thatcher for being complicit in Hillsborough cover up.. the war on the miners and on Liverpool. Heath (best not even go there) ... doesn't matter which Tory PM you look at they're all involved in scandal.

 

[waspish]

Said before these people/mp’s are wired differently mentally! How can you lay down the law regarding Covid then arrange a “Party” is frankly something I can not comprehend!

 

[Blue Mist]

I agree, but replaced by who?

Me ? At least I am honest. I haven't got a clue how to run a bath never mind a country but when has that ever stopped anyone ?

 

[Mike D]

He is no different from any of his predecessors ..... Camerons been caught out in lobbying scandal, Thatcher for being complicit in Hillsborough cover up.. the war on the miners and on Liverpool. Heath (best not even go there) ... doesn't matter which Tory PM you look at they're all involved in scandal.

True but this has reached a new level, none of them would ever have dared. The constant drip, drip is very telling somebody is really turning the screw on Johnson.

 

[mosssideblue]

Me ? At least I am honest. I haven't got a clue how to run a bath never mind a country but when has that ever stopped anyone ?

If you bring back the birch and hanging, you get my vote

 

[west didsblue]

I get the impression they are now desperate for a police enquiry so that they can say they are not commenting because of the ongoing enquiry for longer than they are doing with the current internal civil service inquiry. The police inquiry will also be an excuse not to immediately publish the findings of the civil service inquiry.

They've no real excuses so they need an excuse not to comment for long enough for people to be distracted by the next thing.

 

[bluethrunthru]

does the bumbling vain lump of pus really believe that he needs to await the outcome of an "independent" enquiry to tell him whether or not he attended a drinks party ( which he did ) in his own back yard - there was a concern about court cases setting a precedent last week ( which it couldn't ) whereas the real concern should be about the precedent being set by Johnson displaying how low the bar is being set just to be PM. Any future PM can behave just as badly and think well however badly I am doing at least I have not sunk to Johnson levels