Len Rum
Well-Known Member
I don't have a problem with your previous admiration for Cameron because it wasn't obvious that his personality flaws would lead us to the current existential crisis.Credulous, I assume, because, unlike you I'm capable of objective thought, ongoing reappraisal of my perspective on a subject and sometimes, changing my views and admitting I was wrong, as I have done over Cameron, something you doubtless view as a weakness, but I hold to be a strength; in any event, your comments about my credulity are water off a duck's back, as I'm certain I'm better equipped to deal with the rough and tumble associated with the inherent dishonestly and venality of men than most - something I do every working day with no little skill and something I'm very well rewarded for so doing.
So, for the avoidance of doubt, as you appear to have failed to grasped the simple point I was advancing; Johnson's rise, in spite of his dishonesty and malign nature, is remarkable because he was widely derided as a figure of fun only a few short years ago, unlike (to any meaningful extent) any previous incoming PM. That is a remarkable achievement and the fact you were unable to decipher that from what I posted, or are unable to acknowledge it, indicates that you are incapable of applying your mind objectively to political thought, which is your loss and reflects far more poorly on you than it does me.
However in the case of Johnson it is obvious that the man is leading us into a crisis yet you express 'admiration' for ' the manner of his rise'.
IMO the man and 'the manner of his rise' are inextricably linked, so you cannot express admiration for one without the other.