Alexis Mac Allister

"way less than 60m"

The clause doesn’t exist between Brighton and Liverpool. The clause is Argentinos Juniors hold 10% -15% of Mac Allister’s economic rights when Brighton sell him on. The fee Brighton get is less than the £60m but the scouse twats still owe that.
 
Last edited:
Midfield signings in the klippety era

Keita, oxlade chamberlain , carvalho, Melo (loan), shaquiri, Grujic, fabinho, thiago, wijnaldum Milner

I'll try and be fair:

Wijnaldum was decent for them and left. Thiago one decent season and very injury prone. Fabinho has been good. Milner is milner. Carvalho too early to tell maybe. Everyone else shittedy shite.

Just saying, its not a given that he fits well. Good player at Brighton though.
 
Midfield signings in the klippety era

Keita, oxlade chamberlain , carvalho, Melo (loan), shaquiri, Grujic, fabinho, thiago, wijnaldum Milner

I'll try and be fair:

Wijnaldum was decent for them and left. Thiago one decent season and very injury prone. Fabinho has been good. Milner is milner. Carvalho too early to tell maybe. Everyone else shittedy shite.

Just saying, its not a given that he fits well. Good player at Brighton though.
Fabinho is a fouling twat. Not fit to lace the boots of Rodri
 
The clause doesn’t exist between Brighton and Liverpool. The clause is Argentinos Juniors hold 10% -15% of Mac Allister’s economic rights when Brighton sell him on. The fee Brighton get is less than the £60m but the scouse twats still owe that.

Not possible. The fee goes to Brighton and they pay the money to Argentinos Junior.

They can't hold 10-15% of his economic rights because it would breach third party ownership rules. They have a contractual sell on clause above the price paid for him but they don't retain economic rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kun
The clause doesn’t exist between Brighton and Liverpool. The clause is Argentinos Juniors hold 10% -15% of Mac Allister’s economic rights when Brighton sell him on. The fee Brighton get is less than the £60m but the scouse twats still owe that.
I thought third party ownership was not allowed in the PL.

Juniors may have a sell on clause.
 
The focus on the price is over the top
If we wanted him we would have paid whatever to get him 60/70/80m
We obviously don’t want him
Dippers are trying to make it about the price and what a bargain he is.
They are obviously the only team in for him
If united, arsenal or us were in then o don’t think he would be going there
He obviously isn’t busy on a Thursday night
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.