Far from it.
Here we have a talented and highly sought after footballer who has the choice to join the most progressive, exciting and (potentially over the next 5 years) successful Club in European football. A Club managed by singularly the best coach in the game bar none playing the game in the true spirit of the beautiful game.
However, said player chooses to renege on his previous commitments and join a club which, whilst globally huge from a sales and marketing perspective, is managed by an utter twat of a manager, is followed by legions of deluded cultists and, from root to branch, are just plain fucking ugly (despite the best efforts of the daily glitter-on-a-turd tricks from the leeching lickspittles in the media for whom The Truth is of no consequence compared to generating revenues, however dishonest).
Whilst ensuring that he makes an even bigger pile of cash (and no-one would deny someone the right to do that), In making this decision he is highly unlikely to achieve what most players are assumed to be in the game for - ie winning trophies, scoring goals, entertaining fans, and playing the game in the right way.
So it therefore leads to an interesting debate in terms of the motivation of top players, the role of agents in influencing their decision making, and the extent to which clubs such as the rags are prepared to go in spunking eye watering amounts of cash (£180 mill for a 29 year old) in the pursuit of failure whilst at the same time their cultist followers and lickspittle media pals try to tell us that in fact it is Manchester City who are ruining football.
It's not boring.